Save Scott Peterson - rushroom.com (What You Should Think)

Accused murderer Scott Peterson is in police custody with two counts of capital murder. DNA tests prove that the bodies that washed ashore are those of his wife Lacy Petersen and his son. Now what we need right now is fairness and Justice for Scott Petersen. We need a candlelight vigil, we need a website to collect defense-fund money, we need the same support mechanisms that were set up for convicted murders like Darlie Routier and Andrea Yates for Scott Petersen. Who will step forward to help this poor helpless victim of society? Now don't all you democrats stand up at once... Darlie and Andrea are innocent right? Wouldn't NOW say something like, Lacy Peterson was spared the bondage of motherhood? The larger point here is that when women murder, they are victims first, murderers second. Women always get a pass, the presumption of innocence, websites and of course support. Men of course are murderers.

Amber.Frey's Book
Amber's Nude Photographs
Scott Officially Sentenced To Death

Simjournal Comments

Name: Thoughtful
Date: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:08:58 AM
Subject: Scott Peterson is not guilty
Comment:
According to the state's own pathologist, Dr B. Peterson, Laci's body had caffeine in it. However her friends testified that she was avoiding caffeine because she was pregnant. Also, her underwear was worn out completely in back but not at all in the front. This wear pattern is only seen when underwear is worn out in normal use. So: Why did Laci's body have caffeine in it? Why were Laci's underpants completely worn out in the seat? The only explanation that can be offered that fits the Scott is guilty theories is that Scott got up that morning and told Laci that he had decided he didn't want to be married so he was going to kill her, so, although she was avoiding caffeine because of the baby, she might as well have a last cup of coffee. Then she replied that in that case there was no point in her wearing her good underwear so she might as well get an old pair out of the scrap clothes hamper and wear those instead. But she also asked him to be sure he dumped her with her Croton diamond watch and her antique diamond earrings since, as she liked to say, she wouldn't want to be caught dead without them. Sound reasonable to anyone? Make you think instead of howl with psychotic rage?

Name: VANESSA
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:13:27 PM
Subject:
Comment:
FUCK THE BITCH I HOPE HE GET FUCKED IN HIS ASS

Name: Jennifer
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 10:24:49 AM
Subject:Scott Peterson
Comment:
I believe Scott Peterson is guilty, however, and a big however, there is not enough evidence to prove it, therefore, he should not be on death row. We cannot continue convicting people without proper evidence, because there are others who are innocent serving time for crimes they did not commit. We have a legal system and most crimes have proper evidence, but when you don't have the blood on the hands and really no way of supporting the theory, then you can't convict. Now, does all the "circumstantial evidence" point to his guilt? Yes...beyond a doubt. Absolutely! But still no solid evidence. Is there room that he might not have done it? Yes. The martians or witch-crafters could have done it as speculated - oh please, but there is room in there for something odd that could have happened. If this guy is as evil as he has been portrayed, and Laci as sweet and kind (which I believe she was), she should have left this guy years ago. We as women or as humans have to face the truth when it first appears. In short...it seems like there is no way there will ever be solid evidence, so...the death penalty is too harsh. Life in prison would be a more just solution.

Name: babsbaby
Date: Saturday, April 14, 2007 4:09:16 PM
Subject:Scott Peterson
Comment:
Fuck Him what the hell is wrong with you people supporting him, donate your money to a piece of shit and that yates woman is as guilty if you dont want them leave you dont have to cut them up and kill them or drown them they ought to do the same to them make them hurt slowly and before they take their last breathe stop let them rest a bit and start again. fuck them i hope he burns in hell i wish someone would kill that fuck

Name: Believe it !!
Date: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:01:25 PM
Subject:GUILTY
Comment:
BURN SCOTT BURN AND TAKE YOUR MOTHER WITH YOU!!!! I think she is just as guilty!!!!!

Name: projectmgr
Date: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:07:11 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Gosh you petersen groupies are dumb. Scott better watch for AIDS semen in his food. I wonder how often he masturbates to dumb groupies. That is the only straight sex he will have anymore. Wait a little while he will be wearing lipstick and answer

Name: Thoughtful
Date: Sunday, December 11, 2005 9:43:59 PM
Subject:Scott Peterson is not guilty
Comment:
I do not believe Scott Peterson is innocent. I know he is innocent. I know this because a careful reading of the prosecution's own case proves it beyond the slightest doubt. If Geragos had proved him not guilty, I might have some doubt as to his innocence, but when the prosecution proves it over and over again then there is no doubt of it. The complete inability of the MPD to find even one molecule of evidence against him, coupled with the overwhelming proof that Laci gave birth to Conner on or about Feb 10th and then survived him by at least 2 weeks absolutely eliminates Peterson from any involvement in the crime. The most tragic feature of this crime is that the MPD had at least 8 weeks to find and rescue Laci but refused to do so because they were afraid to look for her will stand forever as a stain on their department. This case proves once again, as has happened so often in the past, that trial in the media is far more effective than trial in a court. The gullibility of the US public has been exploited once again and there seems little doubt it will be so used in the future.

Name: anonymous
Date: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:24:04 PM
Subject:Have seen Scott a number of times over the last year
Comment:
I work at SQ Prison and see him. In observing him over time I see a very physically healthy, notably thinner looking guy than seen on tv and prior to prison. He appears very focused, reading or writing intently sitting indian style on his bunk - usually wearing grey sweats and a white t shirt or a pair of basketball style shorts with a whit t once again. He is nimble and very alert, one time actually hopping off of his bunk when i startled him and moving very quickly toward cell front to check out the unfamiliar face. After seeing him only in the press and on the tv until relatively recently, he is surprisingly slender, very young looking and very physically coordinated and fit. The guy moves real quick, when he moves, but in an incredibly natural nimble and fluid manner. He is basically all business but occasionally flashes a big, "I'm showing my pearly whites" smile, while clearly communicating an underlying message that he wants me to get the hell out of there. (its basically a phony smile, that seems to be designed to appear polite and appeared to originate from knowing his looks and some well placed charm could get him his way. At face value, he projects an air of arrogance, lending the impression that it is beneath him to be where he is. He also seems impatient and restless, seen in his pacing and moving about frequently in hsi cell. One could say the impatience he shows makes it almost seem that he's just waiting for someone to come up to his cell, any minute and deliver a message that a car is waiting outside to pick him up and take him out of here. Some say he is in denial and it just has not sunk in that he really is on death row and is sentenced to die and will more likely than not die in SQ either by execution or natural causes. This type of denial is very typical for new and recent arrivals; but over time the reality that they are probably never going to leave this place alive just socks the wind out of the average death row inmate. In most cases, I don't feel sorry for them at all. But I did meet a guy once who I felt pretty bad for. He was all of 27 y.o. and was sentenced to death for executing 3 men who had gang-raped his 13 year old niece. What sunk him was that the judge asked him if he (the inmate) were in that situation now would he do it over again? Unfortunately he told the truth, which was that he absolutely would and said further that most of the people in the courtroom including the judge would probably want to do the same or would do it if they were in the same situation. I said I thought it just wasn't a really good idea to have said that but I respected his honesty. Anyways I can't feel all bad about a guy who takes out men who rape little girls. Sometimes a little home style justice just ain't such a bad thing, especially with rapists, because they got lenient sentences for what they do and they will probably do it again, wrecking more people's lives for good. People are never the same after a violent sexual assault. Back to Scott. As I said, some say he is in denial but you could also think he is very confident and intent on getting out on appeal. All in all, Scott seems like he is doing well for someone in his situation. He is in no danger of assault by other inmates because he has no contact with the general population. So for all of you who wish he'd get it up the ass, etc.. It ain't happenin'. But I assure you, being sent to your room (a 9 X 3 cell with a bunk taking up almost half of it) for the rest of your life is pretty fucked I'd say. He basically has no life to speak of except for what he can make of it inside that teeny space - that's it - no more things like simply going to the movies, or eating a pizza or walking in a park, and the list of what we free folks just take for granted just goes on and on..Unless he wins on appeal, and I believe there is a very good chance that he will on a variety of legally actionable problems with his trial and lack of evidence. And, whether he did it or not, I firmly believe in protecting the constitution above all, he should walk regardless if his constitutional rights were violated, period. If you truly don't like it go kill him yourself. Sometimes I think he definitely did it, but at other times I don't think he did making him just another wierdo. Death row at SQ is a living hell for sure. I hope he did it if he stays. And if he did it I hope he stays. ****Signing off from the inside

Name: anonymous
Date: Saturday, December 03, 2005 4:17:56 PM
Subject:Have seen Scott a number of times over the last year
Comment:
I work at SQ Prison and see him. In observing him over time I see a very physically healthy, notably thinner looking guy than seen on tv and prior to prison. He appears very focused, reading or writing intently sitting indian style on his bunk - usually wearing grey sweats and a white t shirt or a pair of basketball style shorts with a whit t once again. He is nimble and very alert, one time actually hopping off of his bunk when i startled him and moving very quickly toward cell front to check out the unfamiliar face. After seeing him only in the press and on the tv until relatively recently, he is surprisingly slender, very young looking and very physically coordinated and fit. The guy moves real quick, when he moves, but in an incredibly natural nimble and fluid manner. He is basically all business but occasionally flashes a big, "I'm showing my pearly whites" smile, while clearly communicating an underlying message that he wants me to get the hell out of there. (its basically a phony smile, that seems to be designed to appear polite and appeared to originate from knowing his looks and some well placed charm could get him his way. At face value, he projects an air of arrogance, lending the impression that it is beneath him to be where he is. He also seems impatient and restless, seen in his pacing and moving about frequently in hsi cell. One could say the impatience he shows makes it almost seem that he's just waiting for someone to come up to his cell, any minute and deliver a message that a car is waiting outside to pick him up and take him out of here. Some say he is in denial and it just has not sunk in that he really is on death row and is sentenced to die and will more likely than not die in SQ either by execution or natural causes. This type of denial is very typical for new and recent arrivals; but over time the reality that they are probably never going to leave this place alive just socks the wind out of the average death row inmate. In most cases, I don't feel sorry for them at all. But I did meet a guy once who I felt pretty bad for. He was all of 27 y.o. and was sentenced to death for executing 3 men who had gang-raped his 13 year old niece. What sunk him was that the judge asked him if he (the inmate) were in that situation now would he do it over again? Unfortunately he told the truth, which was that he absolutely would and said further that most of the people in the courtroom including the judge would probably want to do the same or would do it if they were in the same situation. I said I thought it just wasn't a really good idea to have said that but I respected his honesty. Anyways I can't feel all bad about a guy who takes out men who rape little girls. Sometimes a little home style justice just ain't such a bad thing, especially with rapists, because they got lenient sentences for what they do and they will probably do it again, wrecking more people's lives for good. People are never the same after a violent sexual assault. Back to Scott. As I said, some say he is in denial but you could also think he is very confident and intent on getting out on appeal. All in all, Scott seems like he is doing well for someone in his situation. He is in no danger of assault by other inmates because he has no contact with the general population. So for all of you who wish he'd get it up the ass, etc.. It ain't happenin'. But I assure you, being sent to your room (a 9 X 3 cell with a bunk taking up almost half of it) for the rest of your life is pretty fucked I'd say. He basically has no life to speak of except for what he can make of it inside that teeny space - that's it - no more things like simply going to the movies, or eating a pizza or walking in a park, and the list of what we free folks just take for granted just goes on and on..Unless he wins on appeal, and I believe there is a very good chance that he will on a variety of legally actionable problems with his trial and lack of evidence. And, whether he did it or not, I firmly believe in protecting the constitution above all, he should walk regardless if his constitutional rights were violated, period. If you truly don't like it go kill him yourself. Sometimes I think he definitely did it, but at other times I don't think he did making him just another wierdo. Death row at SQ is a living hell for sure. I hope he did it if he stays. And if he did it I hope he stays. ****Signing off from the inside

Name: inked
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:36:33 PM
Subject:Guilty
Comment:
Scott Peterson is GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY shake your heads and start living in reality, where Scott Peterson is GUILTY

Name: JBond
Date: Monday, September 05, 2005 7:20:24 PM
Subject:
Comment:
Scott Petersen got the royal shaft by: The judge deliberately and obviously stacking the jury against him, the lone juror who gave the sign to Lisa's family that they were going to get him, not sequestering the jury in a high profile case, Gloria Alred controlling the main witness to get her man-hating agenda across. The main witness that had been involved in one or two of these situations before becoming involved with Scott. She had two kids out of wedlock deliberately and Ms. Alred thinks she is a hero for raising kids this way. Laci's family interfering with the so-called crime scene. Several women had disappeared in the Petersen's neighborhood before Laci did. With evidence that didn't fit and only a short while for the jury to deliberate a verdict, should make for quite an appeal which hopefully get Scott free. Sure he's the type your daughter should avoid, but that doesn't make him a murderer.

Name: Cristi
Date: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:55:56 AM
Subject:
Comment:

I think that Scott Peterson is guilty.Why some people ask, is because he wanted to be with Amber Frey, and the only way that he could be with her without Laci knowing about it is if he killed her. I think he is a sick person..He is getting justice for what he did.

Name: Staci
Date: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:20:53 AM
Subject:
Comment:
If it were not for Amber Frey I think Scott would still be lurking outside the walls of jail. Circumstantial evidence or not that SOB killed his wife &; baby. A case in NY mirrors Laci's only they have not found the body of the poor woman. They cannot get a suspect in custody but the whole town and some of the woman's family believes that they are dealing with another Scott Peterson...just no proof other than rumors. Audrey Herron vanished w/o a trace along with her car a few months before Laci. Her case is listed on Laci's website. It is very sad, she has 3 young kids. 2 of which are living with that bastard. How do people get away with things like this? Makes me sick!

Name: vale42
Date: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:58:08 PM
Subject:scott peterson
Comment:
scott peterson is so dam guilty it angers me, 1st of all he showed no remorse that his poor wife was even dead and had been brutally murdered and also his unborn son,,,,, 2nd of all he was out on the bay the day she disappeared, how convenent,,, oh i was just fishing ,, must think everyone is a moron ,,, but death is to f______ good for the bastard... put him in prison and release him to other prisoners and let them deal with him,, torture him let him know what its really like ,,,kill him the same way he did laci and connor ............

Name: Jackson
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2005 4:17:34 PM
Subject:
Comment:
Keep in mind that there are numerous counts of double murder happening everywhere in the US, but this case is special because death sentence is usually rare especially without solid evidence and witness. There are many other murders with more convincing evidences but the murderers were not sentenced to death. I am not saying we should free Scott Peterson, but I believe his verdict is partly due to public hype and media influence onto the juries.

Name: Karen Goodman
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:09:05 AM
Subject:
Comment:
He was convicted on surcumstantial evidence! I'm not opposed to them convicting him, But he is going to be put to Death!!! What if he didn't do it. They would be killing an innocent man. That is wrong. It just makes you wonder who in the upper government he pissed off.

Name: john h.
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:51:54 PM
Subject:Scott Pedersen
Comment:
I agree---I hope it takes a while to get his dealth penalty---and that during this time he is used as a little sex slave and get his cute little st8 ass fucked and forced to suck inmates off!. He will be a little sex toy for the boys in San Quentin

Name: SHELL
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:45:09 PM
Subject:SCOTT PETERSON
Comment:
SCOTT PETERSON IS AS GUILTY AS THE DAY IS LONG!!! SENTENCING HIM TO DEATH IS THE BEST THING THAT COULD HAVE HAPPEN TO HIM. ALTHOUGH, HE WILL PROBABLY DIE IN PRISON BEFORE HE IS ACTUALLY PUT TO DEATH. BUT HEY!! THE LONGER HE HAS TO SIT &; ROT!!! THE BETTER!!! HE IS THE WORK OF SATAN!!! HE DOES NOT DESERVE TO BREATH THE SAME AIR AS WE DO!!! JUST BECAUSE HE WAS SLY ENOUGH TO COVER MOST OF HIS TRACKS....DOES'NT MEAN HE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED INNOCENT!!! NOT BY A LONG SHOT!! HE'S REALLY GOT A LOT OF NERVE!!! NO HEART!! CAN'T FIGURE OUT WHAT PUMPS THE BLOOD THROUGH THE SLIME BALLS VEINS.....MUST BE ICE!!!

Name: sheafromMA
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:33:53 PM
Subject:Scott Peterson
Comment:
FINALLY SOME JUSTICE FOR LACI AND CONNOR. SENTENCED TO DEATH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You got what you asked for Scott. I hope a big black man makes you his bitch before they kill you.

Name: LtBitt2lil
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:27:32 PM
Subject:Scott Peterson
Comment:

Any one who thinks that Scott Peterson is innocent is just nuts!!He is sooo guilty. When the jury read the verdict, when the family members of Laci spoke to Scott, and when the judge read his sentence, there was absolutely NO reaction from this jerk!! Scott is a cold blooded murderer!! Not because he cheated on his wife, more than half the married men in america do that, big whoop! I think he killed her because of all the things that he said to his girlfriend while they were looking for Laci. And then he tried to flee, infact, his mother gave him the money that was found in his car when they arrested him!! He hid the Laci buttons in his car and didn't hand them out, he made concrete anchors, he bought a boat that no one knew about, he choked his wife to death in a struggle in the home and then dumped her body in the bay.I hope that someone in prison gets a hold of this jackass and slits his throat!!

Name: George
Date: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:54:14 PM
Subject:Kangaroo court of scott &lacy peterson&unborn child
Comment:
First of all Nancy Grace listening to you makes me puke!!I have watched the complete trial of Scott &; Lacy Peterson&;unborn child how sad! There was nothing to prove he did anything.I don't know if Scott is guilty or not do you? I also watch the cold case files there were some on death row that were not guilty due to DNA that were set free. I feel that through Kangaroo Justice the people in charge will be the people hunted due to unfair judgements mostly from the media.

Name: wendy bissoon
Date: Saturday, March 12, 2005 7:21:28 PM
Subject:
Comment:
i think they should tie chains to scott's hands and feet and pull him apart slowly! I mean if you marrying someone make sure you really like that person!!!!!! I would call him a name or two but i know best.Scott needs JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!He should accept God in his life before they finish him off.

Name: KIMBERLY H.
Date: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:38:48 PM
Subject:SCOTT PETERSON
Comment:
I dont understand in my heart how they can convict someone on a murder that there is absolutly no physical evidence in to prove that the man that has been charged commmited. I dont know why but I feel in my heart that this man most likely did not kill his wife and that is the way a lot of people feel that I have spoken to. They cannot convict a man of murder when there is no evidence to prove that he has killed any one. I beleive that they should have declaired a miss trial in this case becasue of all that happened with the jurey in this case and the fact that there were so many jurors taken off the jury during the trial. If I were his lawyer I beleive that i would have gotten hom off of what he was ultimitly convicted of. I think that he did make some stupid mistakes and should not have lied about his affair to anyone but the lie I think was a way of keeping something else away from the family that would hurt them any more than they were.This whole thing with him being convicted of second degree murder for his son also brings up some stuff about abortion and wether or not that should be done. If a man does not know that a girlfriend or someone he has slept with is pregnant and she goes and has an abortion shouldnt that also be considered murder because it is hightly possible that the man could have wanted this baby. How can abortion be legal when a pregnant person is murdered and they charge the person who committed the crime with murder for that child and a mother who has an abortion and kills that child is not convicted of murder also? None of it really makes sence to me. I would love to hear others comments on this subject if anyone would care to answer.

Name: Audrey Tetzeli
Date: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 6:47:27 PM
Subject:free the innocent
Comment:
myself and a few of my friends will to the end refuse to believe that a loving husband and would-have-been father would commit such a horrible crime. he is innocent and to find the guilty one must have evidence which in the case of Scott Peterson they had no evidence, only a series of coincidences. he did admit to having an affair and is heartily sorry for that but many people commit adultery but that doent make them murderers and it never will. so before accusing an innocent man look at the facts, scoot DID NOT commit this horrible, unjust crime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Name: Linda Kennedy
Date: Monday, March 07, 2005 9:07:14 PM
Subject:Good
Comment:
I am happy to see him go to prison i hope they beat his ass good. The Peterson family upholds his wrondoing and that mom of his is sickening.> I just think Laci was a beautiful young lady and what a dog she was married too.

Name: that one guy
Date: Saturday, February 12, 2005 11:48:39 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson killed OJ's wife too he should go to hell!!!

Name: that one guy
Date: Saturday, February 12, 2005 11:46:04 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
hey did u c the new Emerica shoes they r so cool and they r so comfertable damn i wish i could buy thousands of them

Name: Gaby
Date: Saturday, January 29, 2005 12:57:06 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I think you all are sick ass people if you really beleive that Scott Peterson is INNOCWNT, he is GUILTY as freakin charged and I hope he rots in jail or is exectued as soon as possible! Face it, he is a murderer!

Name: mariana
Date: Saturday, January 29, 2005 12:52:05 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
it is ashamed, is enough !amber, relationship with scott what a joke.!!amber is an idiot,can you see the temptation of scott!?what was he thinking?!The maint thing here is what really happend and ,the police should get real,there are ather women missing in that area,and haw many will be diappearing,i believe Laci's baby is alive,they war adopted.scot is a victim as well as laci and connor.I can't belive fam.rocha belived it so easilly,they should stay together with scott'parent,all of them should know cott by then.what a shame!! ps. amber came with her book and her att. to" atract or distract", the attention that is a strategy,we can think she is a b.naive but i think her book should be named "look how i got way with murder" sorry but is not abvi. (sorry for my spelling,this is my sec.lang.)

Name: Davey
Date: Friday, January 21, 2005 6:15:33 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I just viewed an opinion poll on www.arrested.com. Can you believe over 40% think Scott Peterson's sentence should be reduced to life in prison?

Name: Carole Griffin
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:57:50 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I am a very happlily married woman and I support Scott Peterson 100/%. Not because I am interested in a relationship with him, but because I think the man is INNOCENT. He is a cad but he is not a murderer. His trial and conviction are a travesty of justice. I hope Scott gets the justice he deserves.

Name: Carole Griffin
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:35:56 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I have been convinced form day one that Scott Peterson did not kill Laci Peterson and her fetus. I do not know who did but thre was absolutley no evidence that Scott did it. He was tried, convictee and sentenced by the media talking head and the bleached blonde b---- Nancy Grace and the b---- Kimberly Newsom. The whole trial was a circus. I am monetarily supporting Geragos' investigation. I do believe the truth will eventually be known. thank you for you website.

Name: theaterbabe
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:47:53 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I haven't written since Dec. 04. It seems like this website has become the 'Rachel and Chrisine' show. it's not that I think Scott is guilty, But don't they remind you of the 'Charlie Manson' groupies??? GET A LIFE GIRLS!!!

Name: theaterbabe
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:40:36 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Boy, I haven't written since late Dec, o4 and it seems like this website has turned into the Rachael and Christina' show. Doesn't anyone else have an opinion? Or does everyone else have a life, They sound just like the 'charlie Manson' groupies....not that I think Scott is guilty, it's just I'm not OBSESSED with him.

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:12:15 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I agree...the legal system is crap. She even admitted to killing her children. There was proof. With Scott there was none. Go figure. I hate to say it as I am a woman, but its a womans world. She killed, what? 5 kids at once.....and her verdict gets overturned. I have no faith anymore in our judicial system.

Name: Christine
Date: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:20:41 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Did not directly pinpoint him to the murder* is what I meant to say

Name: Christine
Date: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:18:56 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I'm working on it. I'm going to post it when I'm done. So this Andrea Yates conviction being overturned is completly ridiculous. The false testimony was so completly trivial to the case. So she gets her conviction overturned over a stupid testimony while Scott gets convicted over evidence that did not directly point him to the case. This legal system is crap!

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, January 09, 2005 7:32:50 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Hey Christine.... Have you written your letter yet?

Name: Christine
Date: Saturday, January 08, 2005 11:26:27 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
There's like a comment rut on this site...someone say something!

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 5:32:52 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
No problem Christine....Let me know if he writes you back!

Name: Christine
Date: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:59:26 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Thank you so much Rachel! I'm going to write to him.=)

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:17:12 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Christine.....I found this on scottisinnocent.com Scott Peterson Maguire Correctional Facility 300 Bradford Street Redwood City, CA 94063

Name: Christine
Date: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:43:31 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
That's pretty interesting...It just makes my opinion that he is innocent stronger. It does make me angry as well...everybody should have a fair trial regardless of their character...The judge, the jury, and everybody involved in his verdict and making the trial unfair should have realizd that they are playing around with someone else's life. Maybe if there wasn't so much media coverage before the trial, it would've been different and fair. I know he isn't going to be sentenced to death anytime soon which is a good thing because I think that his defense has a really good shot at getting an appeal. The thing that bugs me the most is the removal of the jurors days before the guilty verdict was made. It is to my knowledge that one of the jurors that was removed wanted to vote not guilty. The reason for his removal remains disclosed. Well I'm glad Scott is remaining cheerful and positive in prison as I read in an article on yahoo...I hope his appeals process begins soon and I will support him 100 percent.

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, January 03, 2005 2:05:30 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I think this is interesting.....anyone else think so?? This is an article I found on Geragos's website. It insinuates that Scott didnt receive a fair trial...I dont think he did either. Scott Peterson's trial judge once called the case "an appellate lawyer's petri dish," with fertile material for resourceful lawyers and reviewing courts. The ingredients of Peterson's appeal are expected to include the site of the publicity-drenched murder trial, which ended with Peterson's convictions for the murder of his wife, Laci, and her fetus. Other issues may include the removal of jurors before the guilty verdict, evidence about the boat that allegedly carried Laci Peterson's body and the tape recordings that may have sealed her husband's fate. Another possibility is the competence of Peterson's high-profile attorney, Mark Geragos, an issue seemingly raised by Geragos himself during the penalty phase of the trial. If Superior Court Judge Alfred Delucchi on Feb. 25 upholds the death verdict by a San Mateo County jury, the next step will be an automatic appeal to the state Supreme Court. That court upholds more than 90 percent of the death sentences it reviews. Peterson's best hope may lie in the federal courts, which overturn nearly half of all death sentences. According to some legal analysts, the defense has one potentially strong issue on appeal: Delucchi's removal of three jurors, two of them in the last days before the guilty verdict. The first juror to be dismissed, for misconduct three weeks into the trial, said he was leaning toward acquittal. "To dismiss a juror during deliberations, there has to be good cause," said University of San Francisco Law Professor Robert Talbot. "If it was in any way connected with a juror being a holdout for the defense . . . that would be a good issue." Most of the potential issues for appeal arose during the guilt phase. The odds against winning such an appeal are always long, particularly in a case in which most of the rulings to be challenged are decisions that the law leaves to the judge's discretion, said Laurie Levenson, a Loyola University law professor. "The law very much puts the burden (of proof in an appeal) on the defendant, and appropriately so, since we like to stick with jurors' verdicts," she said. One issue certain to be raised is Delucchi's refusal to move the trial out of San Mateo County. The trial was transferred from Modesto to Redwood City because of intense media coverage and sympathy for the victims. Geragos requested another change of venue before the trial, saying questionnaires showed most prospective jurors had heard about the case and nearly half had prejudged it. Delucchi denied Geragos' request for a transfer to Los Angeles, saying there was no evidence that publicity would be less pervasive in "the media capital of the world." Other potential issues involve Delucchi's rulings on evidence. The judge allowed evidence that a trained dog traced Laci Peterson's scent from the Berkeley Marina parking lot to a pier four days after she disappeared. Daniel Horowitz, a criminal defense attorney from Oakland, called the evidence "close to a smoking gun" and said the judge's ruling was scientifically questionable and thus vulnerable on appeal. The defense also may appeal Delucchi's decision to let the jury hear dozens of tapes of phone calls between Peterson and his secret girlfriend, Amber Frey, in the weeks after his wife disappeared. The tapes revealed him as anything but a grieving husband; he's reciting love poems to Frey while lying repeatedly to her about his plans and even his whereabouts. Prosecutors argued the conversations showed consciousness of guilt. But attorney Jonna Spilbor, a former San Diego prosecutor, said the tapes should have been excluded because, she said, "The tapes provided the jury with a reason to hate Scott Peterson" and "allowed the prosecution a convenient shortcut on the road to guilty." Peterson's appellate attorneys may also argue he was denied his constitutional right to competent legal representation. Geragos seemed to foreshadow that argument when he told jurors he hadn't been fully prepared for the penalty phase because he'd expected an acquittal. "Legally, I think he was setting the grounds for ineffective assistance of counsel," Levenson said. "He was falling on his sword."

Name: The Author
Date: Sunday, January 02, 2005 11:02:38 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Please Read-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Folks:

Thanks for hanging out here, for reading and for the writing on the site. Its crazy cool that you are here.

Who am I? My name is Steven your host and, I have run rushroom.com since 1994. I wrote the code that runs this site and, watch everything that goes on here. I know exactly how many Kim's there really are and no, I am not telling. ROTFL! As some of you have figured out this software, written in C# and ASP.NET and a SQLServer-2005 (yes I am running the beta) has a few bugs but for the most part, works. With all the comments for and against Scott Peterson left here I am busily writing software to take and present comments in a Forum format. Please be patient.

For the record this site is not a pro-Scott Peterson site at all, this blog records what I think about the issues of the day, Scott among them.. If you look at the actual article, the point I was making was that women who murder like Darlie Routier get sympathy websites and all the support, men who murder get the death penalty long before the jury gets around to it. Anyway, There are a few other things here besides just Scott Peterson. ROTFL.

Personally I think he did it. However, there is not enough evidence to convict him. There is a smoking gun somewhere, while I don't know what it is, I figure its coming sooner or later. Anyway here is something new to sink your teeth into. Click This To Check It Out.

Anyway, there is more stuff here than just Scott. Click Here.

Enjoy!

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, January 02, 2005 12:25:38 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Oh brother....here we go again with your stupid comments. We were being mature until you came back. Really....When you can learn to wipe your ass by yourself, please come back. Until then, none of us (atleast myself) will not even respond to you. Its not worth my time. Christine...I back you up! Just ignore the idiots who cannot do anything else except bash people who are entitled to their opinions. They are so obsessed that they will do anything to make someone think how they think. We have our own minds and acting the way those people are, sure as hell will not change my mind.

Name: Christine
Date: Sunday, January 02, 2005 6:21:03 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Wow someone has a low IQ...

Name: kim 2
Date: Sunday, January 02, 2005 1:07:37 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You what Christine? Your bra size is circumstancial. Ya that's right, Kim 2 back in da house! I do feel a little sorry for Scotty though. He had a flake for a lawyer. Wasn't there for the verdict, didn't prepare for the sentencing phase..... I guess Geragos didn't care anymore. I mean, how much do you think he fleeced the Peterson family for? If you want to blame someone Rachel, don't blame the judge and jury, blame the defense. What did Scotty's defense turn out to be anyway? Satanic cult? Transients? Alien abduction? Charles Manson? Ted Bundy? Listen Rachy, Geragos his all Hollywood and all business. He knew all along that he did it in the kitchen with the plastic, the cement blocks, the boat and the pliers. He's got bigger fish to fry now. He doesn't have time to waste on a guy who is doomed to looking at four walls for eternity. I'm sure Scotty's day will be filled with reading your mail. I just figured you out girlfriend. You're a tree hugger aren't you? Free Willy Rachel!!!! Free Willy!!!!!!

Name: Christine
Date: Saturday, January 01, 2005 9:16:35 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Exactly...that's the bottom line. All evidence is CIRCUMSTANCIAL.

Name: rachel
Date: Saturday, January 01, 2005 8:33:49 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I have a few thoughts to post also. Everyone is so quick to say "noone knew about Scotts boat" etc...It was premeditated. Since everyone says circumstancial is admissable, what about the thought that everyone in his family knew he had a spending habit. What if he knew if he told everyone he bought a boat they wouldve given him hell. Like "Come on Scott, you have a baby coming, etc.etc.." I mean, it is known he had a problem with buying things he couldnt afford. I know, with my boyfriend I buy things and dont tell him because i know he would get mad and complain etc... I am not being mean to people its just people got brainwashed from the media i think. They just said "Yeah he is guilty" but if you look close, there are many things that just dont make sense. Even with circumstancial cases there are things that fit together in the puzzle. Here there was none. It was all based on his actions and how he acted. I really believe that. There are missing peices that until or if we ever get them, will never make me say "YEP! HE DID IT!" If they find the anchors, yep, fry him. Oh about those anchors.......Could the possibility be that he made one anchor and maybe while he was working on it, picked it up and sat it somewhere else? Making the multiple "rings" on the ground? I mean, that is like me making a dough ball for bread and rolling it and picking it up and sitting it down etc....Anything is possible. That is why i have so much trouble with this case. Nothing makes sense. Until i see some good evidence, i will still think he is innocent.

Name: Christine
Date: Saturday, January 01, 2005 3:08:39 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
If somebody spotted Scott at the marina, then how could they also not see him lugging around a massive bag inside the boat? As far as him telling him that he was going to be playing golf earlier, I did not hear of that. But I also heard of him saying that he had a choice between going golfing or going fishing that day and that's what he chose. Now let me ask you this...Why would he say he was going to go fishing at the marina if that is the place he wanted to dump the body? That is quite stupid and I recall that that is one of the main reasons of his conviction. I will quote a juror now. "If the bodies had been found in somewhere like Yosemite Park, we wouldn't be here." I heard many theories of the "round things" but it was proven that they were used to repave his driveway. Now how on earth would someone be able to fit 4 massive pieces of concrete, himself, and a big body on a boat that is very small? Have you seen this boat he was fishing on? Now as far as the defense attorneys on tv. The evidence they couldn't find that proved to them that he wasn't guilty, doesn't mean that he is guilty either. I'll state once again that all evidence is circumstancial! ALL OF THE EVIDENCE IS CIRCUMSTANCIAL!! Nobody could find a single piece of evivdence that actually linked Scott to the murder either. Now as far as Scott watching the search in the marina...maybe he just wanted to see how it was going...there are plenty of reasons why he could be there again which is all circumstancial!! Your opinion that Scott made two trips to the marina is completly wrong and one of the reasons I believe that is because somebody would've spotted him. Somebody in the neighborhood or at the marina. Scott Peterson is innocent. I know I'm being repetitive but I will say it again. SCOTT PETERSON IS INNOCENT!

Name: Mathew
Date: Friday, December 31, 2004 1:58:42 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I will stop being childish now and discuss the case. Christine and Rachel give your take on the following questions. 1. Where are the concrete round things, whatever they are that were obviously made in Scotts boathouse, because someone made 4 round things out of concrete at sometime in December and now they cannot be found? Where are they? 2. The only reason Scott offered his alibi to be at the marina is because the police had already spoken to a maintenance man at the marina who saw Scott there on the day in question? True or false. He had told family and neighbours he was playing golf earlier? True or false. 3. Why were defence attorneys on CNN's Larry King and Greta Van Sustarens On the Record not able to find a single piece of evidence to hang their hat on and say he was not guilty on TV? Not that TV matters but they are defence attorneys you would think they would be able to find something would'nt you? 4. Why did Scott lie to his own Mother about his location at the Berkeley Marina in February 2003 when he was secretly watching the police search the lake? The only reason the police knew he was there was because of GPS tracking. You have to admit that is odd to be at a place 2 months before the bodies were found secretly watching because there is no need to be there secretly because nothing has been found yet. Why be there in secret when nothing has been discovered yet? That is odd. One thing I do agree on though is the boat video should be shown. Except not that one because you have to simulate exactly the events of the day for it to be admitted into evidence. The prosecution should have stipulated to the facts with the defence and both gone out into the marina on a day with conditions, weight and weather the same as December 24th 2002. They should have conducted the experiment and seen which way the cookie falls. I believe the boat would have tipped over, but I personally think Scott made 2 trips out to the marina. One in the middle of the night to dump the body there and one the following day to look like a misguided hapless fool who did not know one end of the boat from the other. That is only my opinion though. Obviously no proof of that. Happy New Year everyone out of prison!

Name: Christine
Date: Friday, December 31, 2004 12:13:55 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
There was a news article on yahoo that basically states that Scott is remaining positive in prison and I'm glad. They say he gets a good amount of postive mail from people who feel the same as we do. I'm glad because if he has to remain in prison against his own free will when he didnt do anything, then I'm glad he has at least some positive mail to read from people who support him like we do. I just hope he gets some proper justice soon...

Name: rachel
Date: Thursday, December 30, 2004 10:02:32 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
BTW....that was to Christine #1 ( the good one) To Christine #2, your comments about anything other then this case are disregarded!

Name: rachel
Date: Thursday, December 30, 2004 10:00:30 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Thank you Christine! I am with you on this....Im tired of the stupid put downs. Not that they bother me but this is just ridiculous. We are here to talk about the case and the case only. To KINDLY explain our side of the story. Not be psychologists and try to set "Psychological Profiles" for the other posters! Lets just discuss our opinions and do it without offending anyone else. That to me makes really good sense.

Name: Christine
Date: Thursday, December 30, 2004 9:59:22 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
This is Christine #2! The two Kims are great and have made this web site totally entertaing. Rachel and Christine are ignorant as hell. Did they evan follow the tril? I got on this web site just to see what idiots were saying. It's been fun.Scott is guilty and got what he deserved.

Name: Christine
Date: Thursday, December 30, 2004 11:30:19 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Let's keep this site going to it's original purpose...because now it's just getting old Kims...some new people need to come in here! People who actually want to discuss the case!

Name: rachel
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 4:08:44 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Oh great! She will be back. Yes, i was on that early because I work for a living and I figured I would get my humor for the day....Kim, why are you here? Who cares what I think..I think you are obsessed with me. :) I think you are jealous because you wish you would have been the one who had gotten killed and then became infamous. Ohwell. Oh, I am just setting your psychological profile. LOL Anyway, this isnt about you so quit trying to make yourself sound cool! Are you my teacher who i need to look up to? Are you determining my future? Nope. I dont feel the need to correct my grammer. Am i a writer? no. Do i care what you think? No. Anyway, its just fun coming here now to see what kind of bullying you think you are doing. I find it quite humorous. If anyone wants to talk about something OTHER then what kim is trying to say, then please feel free. This is getting a little boring to tell you the truth.

Name: Kim
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 3:24:48 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
There you go again Rachel..........I'm sure God isn't very proud of the things you are saying! Seriously........you got on this website that early?? I think you might be a little obsessed or maybe you just like sparring with us! Which is it? By the way (only a moron uses acronyms), you misspelled "sense", forgot to capitalize, and you need to put a hyphen between contractions. Don't you feel stupid when you say that WE need to be intelligent and have common sense when you aren't even on a fifth grade level in spelling and grammar?? For a couple of gals that keep saying over and over that they don't have to defend themselves, you sure have been working hard at it! Hey Christine, maybe you could handle one of Scott's appeals! Oh! I just figured it out! I bet witnessing this gross injustice spurred you on to be an attorney! Your going to devote the rest of your life to fighting for the Scott Petersons of the world who have been unjustly accused! Gotta go......I'll be back!

Name: Christine
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:33:45 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Yes I couldn't have said it better rachel! Now all you kims here really need to go away and leave this website for it's actual purpose. (By the way, I'm no housewife, I'm going to school to get my Paralegal degree and then It's straight to law school from there!) Not that I have anything to prove to you, but you two really should read over all the messages you post and just understand that you sound very very stupid. Now go away...noone likes you.

Name: rachel
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 6:50:46 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I hope you realize how freaking dumb you two sound.....LOL Hey, more power to ya! You shouldve been married to Mark Hacking....Then he would have disposed of you two and we would be without 2 smart, mature, intelligent girls. ( BTW...that was circumstantial) haha. Anyway, really go away. If i bore you so bad then just go jump off a cliff so you dont have to listen to me anymore....What you guys dont get, is there is alot of people who are smart enough to see that the evidence in this case gives possibility that he didnt commit. What about the testimony we didnt get to hear? The lady who saw Laci Peterson walking her dog that morning? Sadley she died right before the trial started. There are other things we never even got to hear and the jury never got to hear. Use common sence. There was no way the boat would not have capsized if he threw laci overboard. It was impossible. While you love to magnify the things that seem odd, look at the things that defy logic....Be open minded. Other then that, i dont know what to tell you, but one day hopefully when your husband kills you for being such a moron, ill be the first one to say "HEY, they deserved it!!" :) Have a wonderful day. Oh, and btw....yes, my heart bleeds for Laci and Connor....But the evidence is just not there. He is a cheater and a liar, yes, but a killer, i dont think so.

Name: Kim
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:17:18 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
She will probably be there too Kim but I'll take a chance.

Name: Kim
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:16:06 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Hey Kim. I found a good page for Mark Hacking. Let's go check it out!! Rachel bores me.

Name: Kim
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:11:02 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Hey, if we are the 2 Kims. Then, Christine and Rachel and be the 2 Amber wannabees!! Fertilizer salesmen really turn me on too.

Name: Kim
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:00:56 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You know, Mathew has a point Kim. This website is comedy. Even if Scotty admitted it, Rachel and Christine still would think he is innocent - and all of us sane people would still be laughing at them. Do either one of you ever shed a tear for Lacy and Connor? Or, do you just wish you could have been in Amber Frye's shoes? I think bowling would be to mind boggling for them. They should stick to something simple that two fat house wifes can do like mini golf.

Name: Kim
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:43:43 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Look Christine, maybe you and Rachel should get together and go bowling. Yes, the twelve close minded jurors..........it's a fetchin conspiracy against your little boy Scotty. I guess he won't be needing his cell phone anymore, not to mention his tackle box. Did you and Rachel go to cosmotology school together? I bet you could be best buds! I bet you both ratt your hair and use the same wash and go color you buy at Walmart!! What do you think other Kim?

Name: Christine
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:24:43 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
The 2 Kims and the Mathew need to leave this site immediatly and stop being immature. If you believe Scott Peterson is guilty, all the power to you, just don't come to this website. Rachel, thank you for standing behind your convictions and supporting Scott Peterson as I do. Scott Peterson is innocent and regardless of the lawyer his family payed so much for, in the end, it was the 12 close-minded jurors who sent him to jail. I will continue to support Scott Peterson and I will continue to discuss the case with other individuals on this site. I hope justice will prevail for him, and I hope he gets his retrial as soon as possible. He is innocent and shouldn't be in jail.

Name: mathew
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:08:32 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
This site is funny. I was reading this and forgot it is actually a PRO SCOTT PETERSON WEBSITE! I should have known that anyway because when you count all the messages here out of the 154 posted you only have about 5 people who are on Scotts side. HA HA HA HA! That is so funny. Good luck you 5 people with convincing the 12 jurors, 98% of the legal fraternity where there were countless DEFENCE ATTORNEYS on TV convinced Scott was guilty, 300 million people in America and most of the world. Thats your homework you 5 people. Good Luck. Happy New Year everybody, yes even you 5 Scott lovers!

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:25:16 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
TO ALL THE PEOPLE WHO ARE HERE FOR THE REASON THIS SITE WAS MADE: I hope you all still continue to support Scott....We know he is innocent. This page has turned into a circus and i am ashamed to admit i fell in their trap....but its all good! I will continue to defend him and voice my own opinion. TO KIM: BTW my kids were at their grandparents for the week while on vacation...Anyway its none of your business...You dont know me and I really could care less about knowing you. Anyway, if anyone wants to have a grown up conversation about the topic of this page, then i will discuss it. I will no longer discuss these childish immature things with people who have nothing better to do then make stupid redneck jokes.

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:18:12 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You didn't know and still don't know if I'm a "dude"! Yet another example of your intelligence............dude?? Who says dude?? Hey, didn't you say that you have kids and a boyfriend?? Wouldn't an intelligent, beautiful, gal like yourself be better served to spend this time with her kids than defending a dead guy on a stupid website? Read to your kids for goodness sake! So, were you refering to your words as intelligent and well spoken or mine? I think it's safe to say that anyone posting messages on this site has a boring life! Someone that mans it 24 hours a day is another story! Ok, you can quit looking through your Cosmo magazines trying to find a picture of a pretty girl to send all of us because I'm going to leave you alone for now. I never called you trailer trash..........I said you were white trash and there's a difference. You don't have to live in a trailer to be trash. Have fun defending yourself tonight. Your defending yourself more than Peterson! How ironic. I'll give you time to look that word up! Farewell Rachel and remember..........think of all the time you could be spending with your kids than having a blog war with middle school girls! Who's the smarty here?? KIM #1

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:12:29 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Again, how more stupid can you sound? Ugh....Get lives....Really. These are typical comments from 13 year olds. Wheres your pics again? Oh,i forgot you are too ugly to send some.

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:05:34 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Ya, and what about your second cousin. You all need to cut that stuff out. Surely you can find someone to get jiggy with that you aren't totaly related to.

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:02:16 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You never answered our question........ are you screwing your brothers or not?

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:01:13 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
KIM #1 SO YOUR A DUDE???? How did i know? :) HAHA! Most likely a gross one! It took so long because I have a life! :) So what if i mispell a word...Who cares! Only people with no life would notice something so stupid! Get a real life...Honest.. Everyone sees how boring yours really is!

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:57:19 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Chicken....I knew you wouldnt agree. Ok....Proved my point! Anyway, Mark Hacking admitted to killing her....There is a difference. When you can tell me one thing that absolutley says he did it, we have a valid argument...Until then, i stand my ground just as you stand yours! An educated person would respect another persons intelligent, well spoken remarks...Its a shame yours were not!

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:55:55 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Kim #1 here. Whoa! I was wondering what took you so long to reply! You were calling your college professors at the prestigious University of Maryland to find out how to spell the word "incestuous"! Way to go! You learned something! By the way.......who said I was a girl?

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:51:37 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Hey Rachel, why don't you set up a web-page for Mark Hacking. Im sure he's innocent too. Just a victim of circumstance and our justice system. Honey, in this world you don't get the justice you deserve, you get the justice you pay for. Apparently, Scott's family retained the best and it still couldn't save his lying ass. They subsidized his whole defense by mortgaging their homes and he took them down with him. If Scott were a real man, he would take his own life, but I guess he thinks he has a chance at the appeal. Way to stay positive Scotty!! Rachel, if you really want to help Scott, send him condems. He will need them when big black Leroy sneaks in his cell at night and sticks his roll of tar paper up his ass!!!! He will thank you for it!!

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:38:22 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Whatever. Say what you want...You guys are most likely little girls in middle school. What does screwing your brothers and listening to John Mellencamp have anything to do with Scott Peterson? You sure do know alot about all this incestuous stuff....HMMM....Let me guess. Anyway, like I said, nothing you say to me will bother me...I know, lets swap pics and see who the real woman is...I bet you are way too Chicken....You are most likely 500 lbs and nasty....Bring it on! Lets see who looks like they live in a trailer park! :) I bet its not me!!!!!!

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:33:53 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Kudos to the new Kim on board! Sorry Rachel but I can't take credit for that one!

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:29:16 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Rachel, did you also believe David Koresh was God? How about Manson as the Messiah? They were better liars than Scott. Come on girlfriend-get out of the trailer park, stop screwing your brothers while listening to John Cougar Mellancamp records, and read a book other than the redneck quarterly. Also, dating your second cousin twice removed doesn't count as a boyfriend and a certificate of completion from the local beauty college doesn't count as a degree either. STOP THE MADNESS!!!

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:28:26 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Kim, I have nothing to prove to you...Nothing whatsoever. I have more important things to do then waste my time explaining myself to you....BTW Just for your information, I have an accounting degree (bachelors) from the University of Maryland. Other then that, you are noone to me and this is not english class. This is about Scott Peterson and how OUR justice system isnt fair. If you cant keep it to that subject, then why are you here?? Let me guess, to prove to everyone how smart you are? HAHA. Whatever! All you sound like is someone who is miserable with themselves and need to make someone else sound stupid. Ohwell. If you get your kicks making fun of others TYPO errors, then so be it. I could care less! Have a wonderful day, KIM! :) SCOTT PETERSON IS NOT GUILTY!!!!!!

Name: Kim
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:16:45 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Rachel..........I was wondering........what college did you go to?? You still can't spell??

Name: Bubba
Date: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:15:41 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Save Scott? His story was pretty'fishy' to say the least. He should have been defended by OJ's lawyer or been a shoe shinin', cotton picker like de Juice were be. Scott is a white boy and doesn't stand a chance. He should spend the rest of his life in prison for bonking that ugly trailor trash Amber Frey - she is one piece of shit. Also, give the death penalty to her lawyer, that publicity seeking whore Gloria Allbright

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 26, 2004 10:59:11 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Setting my psychological profile? That is funny...are you EDUCATED enough to give me that profile? I doubt it...Probabaly a high school dropout with a GED. Its funny..I came here once and checked back and forth periodically just for giggles and people like you are so quick to judge...I dont give a flying flute what you think or not. I am merely displaying my opinion. If you check back, i never once insulted anyone until they insulted me. I, by the way have a wonderful boyfrieind, I dont dream of being with Scott Peterson. My boyfriend feels the same way I do. That justice was not served. This is what this is about. If you really want to sound so intelligent, then look back and tell me where I said I wanted to write to Scott Peterson. Not once did I say I wanted to write to him..Get your story straight. I think another person asked me how to write and I merley gave my opinion on where I thought a letter could be sent...Did I say I was going to write? NO....So anyway, just for your information, I have a college degree, a wondeful job, great kids and an awesome boyfriend....Attention is not my problem and i am being 100% truthful to this. I started writing because i feel that if this was me, i know i did not receive a fair trial. So yes, God will judge all of us. Even though i have tremendous faith in God, it does not mean I am perfect...Just like you...We all do things we should not do...It doesnt mean i am going to hell. I know how to repent and I am sure Scott Peterson does too. So even if you think he committed this crime, if he repents and feels truly sorry, he will be right up there in heaven one day. So, all i am saying is dont be so quick to judge. You were not there just like the rest of us were not there. You dont know any more then i do. Ive had enough of you people telling me what I am. I am nothing to you because you know nothing about me...So, please, knock it off with the "holier than thou" stuff. It doesnt faze me in the least.

Name: Kim
Date: Sunday, December 26, 2004 10:05:07 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I have been reading these "blogs" and I must say that it's entertaining at best! I was going to write that the "ladies" with Scott Peterson crushes should take a class in grammar and spelling but Jane beat me to it! This is the only Pro-Scott website so I'm afraid your going to have to put up with Bubba and the other 99% of the population! You talk about other people being judged by God someday and then in the next sentence, you curse and tell them what their own judgement will be because they hold someone accountable. I assure you Rachel.......this was never an intelligent blog! I've never met you or your friend Christine but I can only imagine that you're white trash, uneducated, immature "girls" with too much time on your hands and too little attention at home! You dream of a good looking guy like Scott Peterson and you formed a school girl crush on him! I'm not making fun of you........I'm merely setting up your psychological profile. I know you'll deny it but deep down you know it's true! I'm sure you'll write to him a few times. Maybe if you send him some money you'll get a reply! This is something that you'll never give a moments thought to in a year! Happy Holidays!

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 26, 2004 6:45:10 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Bubba....Go away. Quit being immature. Your not doing anything except letting anyone who reads this, see what a moron you are....Get a life. For real....This was an intelligent blog here until your 6th grade comments started. We are discussing the peterson case and our justice system. From the type of comments you write, i really do see you being scotts bitch....Hopefully if it ever happens he will kick the living shit out of you. Now go away!

Name: Bubba
Date: Saturday, December 25, 2004 7:55:21 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scottie is my girlfriend

Name: Christine
Date: Friday, December 24, 2004 5:37:43 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Yea really...I hate all you lowlives who come here and bash Scott Peterson. This is a pro site so go away. We are open minded individuals who beolieve he is innocent. And we aren't forming a verdict based on opinion alone. He is innocent and will not "fry".:)

Name: rachel
Date: Thursday, December 23, 2004 7:32:49 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Shut up! You dont even know what you are talking about. Like i said to other bashers, this is a website FOR scott peterson....Go elsewhere where all the other hateful people are and talk about him there! You are dismissed! Now go!

Name: mathew
Date: Thursday, December 23, 2004 12:47:17 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Also one more point for the Scott lovers. The people out there who made the best case for the prosecution on tv were defence attorneys. That is what is so funny. The people who can't see any bad in criminals at all and always do their best to defend them could not even defend Scott and actually made cases for his guilt. Now that is funny! To the Rocha family, my heart goes out to you and all victims of crime. See I don't feel sorry for the Petersons because at least they still get to see their son, and because of him, the Rochas don't have the same luxury. Unfortunately for the Rocha family though I think the verdict may be overturned on appeal but don't worry if it is he will be fried next time, guaranteed. Cheers! Merry Xmas and Happy New Year!

Name: mathew
Date: Thursday, December 23, 2004 12:38:41 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Hey everybody. Don't worry. Rachel and Christine know alot about this case. See there is a name for people who for some reason have this desire to write to convicted killers and correspond and feel pity for them. Well that is fine because THANK GOD FOR US THEY ARE THE MINUTE MINORITY WHO IN ALL HONESTY HAVE AN OPINION THAT AGAIN THANK GOD IS NOT COUNTED AT ALL AND TOTALLY DISREGARDED. Because you see the 40+ lawyers they have had on court tv think Scott is guilty. Scott himself knows he is guilty because why in February 2003 before Laci and Connor (God rest their souls) washed up at the Berkley Marina was Scott there secretly watching the police search the Bay for who knows what. In a phone conversation on On The Record between Jackie and Scott, Scott lies to his mother about his location. Now that is not a problem lying about where you are, the point is WHY SECRETLY WATCH THE POLICE SEARCH A PLACE WHERE THERE IS NO NEED TO BE THERE BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING WHICH HAS BEEN FOUND YET. THE BODIES DID NOT WASH UP FOR ANOTHER COUPLE MONTHS. PLEASE ANSWER THAT QUESTION ALL YOU SCOTT LOVERS. MY OPINION IS IT IS A GUILTY MIND BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING IN THE BAY IN FEBRUARY 2003 BECAUSE THERE BODIES WERE NOT DISCOVERED FOR ANOTHER 2 MONTHS. SCOTT WAS THERE BECAUSE HE WAS WORRIED THE WEIGHTS MAY NOT HOLD DOWN THE BODY, AND THATS WHY HE WAS THERE IN SECRET. GOOD LUCK SCOTT LOVERS. YOU SAD BUNCH!

Name: theaterbabe
Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 3:06:22 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I hope that Scott wasn't convicted based on the very biased Court TV lawyers who seemed ready for a public hanging. I hope as the years go by that scott is proven innocent. I pray for both families. I don't know whether he did it or not...I'm leaning towaeds 'not' but with the minute amount of evidence..I could not condemn him to death..Some people are playing God and will eventually have to answer to Him! A special prayer for Mrs. Roche and Mrs. Peterson.

Name: Chris
Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:45:44 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
LET THE BASTARD DIE A LONG SLOW PAINFUL DEATH AT THE HANDS OF THE OTHER SICK AND TWISTED ASSHOLES IN JAIL. WHEN HIS WIFE AND CHILD WHERE FLOATING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BAY, THAT PIECE OF SHIT WAS ON THE PHONE TRYING TO GET A PIECE OF ASS. IF THE STATE WOULD ALLOW SPECTATORS TO HIS DEATH, I WOULD BUY UP THE WHOLE FIRST ROW TO WATCH THE PIECE OF SHIT GASP FOR HIS LAST BREATH.

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:09:09 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Bubba....Its schmucks like you who get on your knees in prison to beg for your ass......Get a life little boy! That is what you sound like anyway!

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:04:45 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Go away you guys! I think i see you guys in Scotts place in a few years with the anger that you have! Noone cares what you say....We are just opened minded. Glen.....Police officers are all alike. There are good ones, but i have to say most of you PIGS are so eager to make your stupid dept give you some recognition that you will fry anyone,,,, even an innocent person! Now, Go away! This is a pro scott peterson site! THANK YOU!!! Now, if you guys dont change your way of thinking then you will rot in hell along with all the other evil people in the world!

Name: bubbas friend
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:41:53 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
you girls can send a letter C/o bubba thats his new gooood friend scott will not make it in the pen,the devil will take him where he belongs!!!!!!!!!!!!! if you girls need a date run an add in the paper

Name: Glen
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:04:13 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
PS, I am not at all biased. I am a retired, career police offivcer. I worked in Law Enforcement for almost 38 years.

Name: Glen
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:41:09 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Christine, If the judicial system worked proiperly, in a few months you could write to Peterson, care of HELL.

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:20:54 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
No Christine....I dont have the address.. I assume you can write the the san mateo county jail and put c/o Scott peterson Or vice versa...I am sure it will get to him.

Name: Christine
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:18:58 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You're right Rachel there isn't any solid proof! That's one of the basic matters of this case. All evidence is circumstancial and there was plenty of reasonable doubt! Scott Peterson is innocent. I want to write Scott a letter, does anyone have the address to the jail he is in?

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:00:19 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
No you crazy dude.....There was more then enough evidence against Ted Bundy.....There wasnt against scott peterson. As i said before, when you can prove to me that he did it i will quit arguing....And i mean SOLID PROOF! (shame there isnt any)

Name: Glen
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:49:09 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Rachel, You probably thought Ted Bundy was innocent also. Did you fall in love with Bundy, like a lot of stupid womenin this couintry. You know Peterson is innocent, he always showed so much remorse during the whole sick thing. The only time he felt bad, was when they caught him.

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:26:52 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Oh you guys need to shove it! Like i said, all you guys are going to be the ones who are begging for GODS mercy one day.......Then your asses will be cooked! :)

Name: Glen
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:50:13 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is a piece of shit that need executed. As they said to Ted Bundy,Buckle up Scottm it.s the law. Cook his sick ass.

Name: bubbas friend
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 10:51:50 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
i sent 50 cents to the fund so Scottie can call the parents of lacy and tell them how sorry he is for killing lacy,conner...while he is bent over the pay phone bubba will have his boat propeller shaft up scotties ass

Name: Seth
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 8:44:14 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Well, the bastard was found guilty. Fry Mother fucker, fry!

Name: tina
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:27:41 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Want to know if Scott really killed his wife? Replace your soul with his. The truth of a man is in the soul of his eye. What did God tell Cain when he killed his brother? He responded by telling Cain that his brother's blood cries from the ground. Yet, God did not sentence Cain to death but cursed him and warned anyone who tried to kill him that they would be cursed. Nobody absolutely without a doubt found Scott to be the owner of the killings of his wife and son...all speculative circumstantial evidence. For instance, how many times have you been deceived by mere intuition, faculty inference, erroneous perception,and emotional bias? The 13th Juror, the Judge, was the most sinful creature on the case that manipulated the 12 jurors to send an inncocent man to death row wtihout a fair trail. Scott didn't have a chance to have a fair trail. The Media already convicted him from suspicion that he was the cold blooded murderer. Anyone who has the tinist speck of hate in their on eye is quilty of murder. One of the Juror's used profanity saying Scott is less than deserving or forgiving, but when it is his time to be judged perhaps someone should remind him of those very same words that he judged Scott by. It appears that there is a curse upon every juror that was on the trial. Some ask how could anyone of them have a peaceful sleep knowing they participated in sending an innocent man to death row. A person is innocent until proven quilty. In Scptt's case, everything was possibilities, nothing so profound to place his handwritting on the wall. Who would if the shoes were turned would like to be judged by the peers of Scott's juror's knowing they were innocent? They were guided and had maded up their minds right from the onset of the trial. So, do we think Scott will have nightmares, scream innocent, or that he did it? Certainly one can lose his mind in a cell waiting for death. Because of this, he could say about anything. Would he know what he is saying? By convicting him, do the courts know what it is doing? Our system needs to be reconstructed because too many people are being crucified like Christ, having to be quiet as a lamb going to be slaughtered by evil humankind hands. Hands that they must wash like Ponteus Pilat. Well, I say to Mark Geragos . . . finding the needle in the hackstack--e.i. the right killer--will be worthwhile in search for the truth and to set an innocent man free. I am in support of Scott's funding investigation.

Name: rachel
Date: Monday, December 20, 2004 8:57:03 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Hey, Your Conscience....... Only GOD knows Scotts heart, mind and actions.....Judgement is not your job!!! HELLO!! Talk to GOD yourself, your Conscience......

Name: Your Conscience
Date: Monday, December 20, 2004 7:34:11 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott can you hear me? hello scott, if you don`t addmitt to your sins scott you wont make it to heaven scott, Scott life on earth is just a trial, life begins after death scott, Scott come clean now then you can turn your life to god scott then maybe you will have a chance for enternal life scott.. the world is waiting scott hope to hear from you soon.

Name: Gil
Date: Monday, December 20, 2004 7:14:13 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I agree with you Mike-you are obviously a smart man. There is absolutely reasonable doubt. Don't fry the guy who could be innocent.

Name: Mike
Date: Monday, December 20, 2004 3:34:47 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
There is no evidence he killed his wife. Period. You can theorize all you want. But that doesn't make a criminal case. That doesn't make it right to convict someone. As for Scott's 'suspicious' behavior, it could be explained that he was indeed feeling guilty -- not over killing his wife -- but for having an affair and for not being home the day she disappeared. He could feel responsible in that regard. Just another THEORY. That was also indeed a robbery across the street, and witnesses saw Lacy with a group of strange men that day. As for her turning up in the bay, if someone else killed, they would have heard Peterson was in the bay the day she vanished and decided to dump her body that, in hopes that if it was ever found, it would implicate him. You have NO IDEA if he is guilty. He might be, he might not be. So please shut the hell up.

Name: HAVE A HEART
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 11:49:35 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
How could anyone say that they are sure Scott did it??? I just hope that noone is ever put in his shoes because ONLY then would you know how it feels....I hope God is with Scott IF he didnt do it and if he did then God will punish, we are not God to take his life and we are not 100% sure if he did or didnt do it. DONT JUDGE, ONLY GOD CAN DO THAT!!! God bless you all and may you all live in peace.

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 11:07:14 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Amen Circumstantial!!! He is innocent!

Name: circumstantial
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 10:32:47 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
All the so called evidence that this case has been based on is purely circumstantial.Ok, so Scott had an affair, big deal! Scott has only been found guilty becuase peoples emotions get in the way of the truth. Where are the real facts? I mean does anyone really think that a murderer would be stupid enough to set himself up as bad as Scott has been set up? A real criminal mastermind would have his wits about him a little more than that. Plus everyone that knew Scott said that he was a very good person, why would he snap all of a suuden and kill his wife? I bet many people have already said this, but just leave the guy alone already, he didnt do it!

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 7:36:44 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You are right Christine....this man didnt nor will he ever have a fair trial because it was such a high profile case. Such a shame....Hopefully the new jury will see that he is guily and didnt have a fair trial..... He is Innocent!!!

Name: Christine
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 7:15:44 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
He is innocent. I don't think he actually did it. I don't think he killed her at all. He may have wanted too, he may have been glad she's dead, but that's no reason to say he's a murder. he should not have been convicted at all. If this case wasn't so high profile, he could've had a fair trial. And I jsut hope the appeals process grants him a fair trial...as fast as possible

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 3:16:36 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I agree...If they honestly felt it then 2nd degree would have been the right way to convict him....Since there was no evidence Directly linking him and proving beyond a shadow of a doubt. Something just seems out of place for me...Usually i am all for getting the bad guy...but this time, i have a feeling that he was not directly involved.... Sometimes i think that maybe he did not like her too much and was kinda glad she was gone, but i dont think he acutally did it....Who knows. I wish i really knew.

Name: julie
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 12:55:23 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
but I will say this.. Because of the lack of evidence and just the fact he acted like an idiot, I think that the jury did first degree just so they could go home, and I think he should have gotten no more than 2nd degree. (because of the lack of physical)

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 12:34:14 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
oops. I meant to write "They magnify the things that look bad and dismiss the things that could have proven he was INNOCENT" Sorry...

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 12:32:54 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I dont know...I mean i could be dead wrong, but something tells me that he didnt do it...Like i said i was not there so i dont know...I am sure there are things we will never know, but as there are too many things that say he is guilty there are also many things saying that he isnt. They magnify the things that look bad and dismiss the things that could have proven he was guilty. Its a no win situation.... I honestly think he was behaving oddly because he didnt want anyone to find out about the way he cheated on Laci....Which is bad but think how many men and women do it...Its unbelievable. So, my opinion is the same: He is innocent. BUT opinions are like assholes, Everyones got one!

Name: julie
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 10:57:27 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
ok, so I'm rude, I'm just so tired of this whole thing. Come on, why would a man sell his "missing wifes" automobile and why would he call the cops saying his wife was missing practically right when he walked through the door. And tell his girlfriend before hand that his wife was dead. And finding him in SoCal with bleached hair and goat and a shitload of money in the trunk of the car. And, once again, he has not seemed to be remotely upset about his wife being dead. Y would anyone say their spouse was dead, unless he knew she was going to be...

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 10:48:40 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Julie, i think you are really rude.... We have our opinions just as you do....this is a PRO scott peterson site anyway. WHy are you here? BTW..i am not an ugly housewife....I am 26 years old and very pretty, skinny and nice....I have a good heart and I am just not one to rush into thinking someone is guilty without the evidence. I think they call that SMART..... Anyway, the media only gives bits and peices..We were not in that court room and we were not there when laci disapeared. So to say that Scott is lauging and smiling etc...is a fabrication. What else does he have to do in jail? He has been there for almost a year now....Better to try to remain cheerful then impending yourself with everlasting doom....I know i would try to make the best of any situation. So until you show me PROOF he is guilty then I dont think you should be in here bashing the man....Geez, Like OMG!

Name: julie
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 10:39:48 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Ya know, Scott Peterson is guilty as hell. Look, he's got no emotions whatsoever, except for when he see's what has happened to his family (and not Laci or Connor), and he just plain and simple doesn't give a shit. "model prisoner" "smiling all the time"... Come on! Anyone who believes he is innocent, sorry to say, is probably nothing more than an ugly housewife who wants to save the cute misunderstood "closet griever". No worries, theres still friends on the outside for all of u. OMG!

Name: M Kamal Khan
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 9:34:34 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I bought a second hand boat, the same size as bought by Scot Peterson. I think it is very odd to take the new boat to a far away ocean the first time and alone at that. I would have a friend or a rerlative with me the first time I try the boat or fish with it. Were there any phone calls from Scott on that day to anyone while he was in the bay area? I saw on TV that two people saw him when he was launching the boat. They said that he was nervous and had difficulty putting the boat in the water. He would be nervous if he was doing something sinister. He chose the perfect day on Dec 24 to dump the body because bno body would be fishing that day. Most would be shopping etc. The other thing that is bothering me is that where did he dismembered her? There had to be some blood. 99.9 % evidence suggest that the only person who could do this crime is Scott. To make it 100% somebody need to pull just one anchor that he made out of that bay.

Name: TP-Buffalo,NY
Date: Saturday, December 18, 2004 12:21:38 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
we should do a poll to see how many people after this case trusts the jury system?

Name: rachel
Date: Friday, December 17, 2004 4:12:54 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Adam...I couldnt have said it better! I am glad you have a smart head on your shoulders. He is definatly innocent.....

Name: Christine
Date: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:07:20 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I agree Adam! You make good points and you are obviously a very intelligent person!

Name: Adam
Date: Friday, December 17, 2004 12:33:57 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Ok, first, to Jane: I hope your being humorous is your "words." Second, Scott Peterson is without dount innocent. What kind of person kills his wife, and then dumps her body into the bay where he told police he was fishing when she went missing? Also, I believe the affair with Amber Frey helped convict Scott. Men have affairs. Not all men who have affairs kill their wives. He was convicted based on his character, and unfortunately on no real, hard evidence. And for those of you who ask, "Why does't he show emotion," well, first, everyone handles stressful situations differently, and second, he's probably still in shock. I know I would be, and anyone who says that's bullshit is bullshitting themselves. Adam

Name: usure
Date: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:51:36 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
what Jane?

Name: Jane
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:29:35 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Why is it that those of you who plead for Peterson are, to a man, unable to spel,l or to form sentences that are gramaticallly correct? Is it possible that you are uneducated to the extent that you are not able to reason? I fear that this is the case.

Name: Christine
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:01:30 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I really hope one day Scott will get his justice. I am honestly praying for him and I am devastated knowing that he is in jail when he shouldn't be. This man is innocent. God will give him his justice and Scott will be in my prayers everyday until he gets his justice.

Name: rachel
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:14:38 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Exactly! If he did it, the peices would come together perfectly....They dont so to me this says something big....He is innocent. As for a fair trial, nope, this man did not get the fair trial he deserved. If anything it was a circus. I think that court tv should not be aloud to report on cases until they are over with....That goes for all the news stations. They just taint the public and the jurors who go home at night and watch the shows. There should be gag orders on ALL trials until they are over with. But, then the silly reporters wouldnt have anything to do would they? Ohwell. If their jobs are jeopardizing peoples freedom then they need to be stopped. Justice will prevail for Scott...one day i hope.

Name: usure
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 1:46:29 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
In my mind every time I read or hear about this case---I have conflicting ideas---one always clashes with the other---he seems like an intelligent man----divorce the girl for crying out loud---why would he murder her??? Something has been eating away at me since this whole thing started---I don't think he did it---he just doesn't fit the profile---but then a lot of serial killers and murders don't "fit the profile" but to me there is something wrong---the pieces don't fit---how can they sentence him to death without any physical evidence??? Part of me wants to think he is guilty and yet part of me thinks he isn't someone who could carry out such a hideous crime---fair trial?? I don't think he got one---give me some "real" evidence----I guess only Laci knows the answer to my question---

Name: cottpeterson
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 12:13:59 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
How does it matter whether he is innocent or not...Death should not matter to him since he should be mentally dead after losing his wife and son... How about this ;-)

Name: rachel
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 8:49:41 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I feel the same way as you do Christine....Its all about Morals. Someones life shouldnt be decided on based on "Morals". I am one for facts and the facts just were not there. Tim, you are right. The justice system is not ruined because now everyone can judge based on morals. I mean, there are people out there who deserve to be in prison for life, but not Scott Peterson....I will pray for him and the families and hope that something good comes out of this...Maybe with all our prayers God will listen.... And for all the people who will say "get real" All i have to say is SHOW ME THE PROOF....Proof that says "Yep, he did it" Believe me, you will not find any....With out circumstance behind it.

Name: Tim
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:49:05 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is innocent!!! How can you sentence a man to death just because you think he killed his wife?? There is no DNA evidence, there isn't a murder weapon, there isn't a murder scene. How in all the world did this man get found guilty??? Gregaros f-ed up big time trying to show off too much for the media etc... It sickens me that the blood thirsty jury has been manipulated and has ultimately tainted the U.S justice system. Only God can judge Scott.

Name: Christine
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:17:20 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Your convictions are as strong as ours Bill so don't be a hypocryte. Your scenario obviously will never happen. Noone pays attention to the actual facts of the case and interprets them reasonably and accuratly. The public is only swayed by the opinion of the rest of the public. Nobody watched the news and saw any ordinary citizen praising Scott's innocence. People were probably too scared to be outspoked about it (although I wouldn't be). The point is, the jury cannot say someone is guilty if there is reasonable doubt. Thoughtout the whole case, the only evidence that was presented was circumstancial, which means, completly open to interpretation. There was no direct evidence pointing Scott to the murder. They based his case on morals. Yes he had an affair with Amber Fry, and yes he lied about it. But that does not make him a murder. Yes he showed no emotion, but that is no means in saying he is guilty or calling him a monster. Now of course I have so many other reasons as to why I believe he is innocent, and if I were to type them now it would be a long list...but I'll post it up sometime tommorow or the day after. Scott Peterson was in my prayers last night and will be tonight I just hope he gets retrialed as quickly as possible.

Name: rachel
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:47:49 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Bill, Geez, your convictions are as strong as ours....Just differently. If they can show me proof that he is definatly the one, then my mind will change. Until then No, i stand my ground. Sometimes its better to be a heartbleeder...I dont go around pissed off at the world. Like i said, i feel for Laci and her family...But my gut tells me that something is wrong with this trial...I am just not clouded by hatred and bash everyone who is on trial...Everyone deserves a chance. I think his will come. And for all the people who say "Rot in hell scott peterson" ya know, those are the ones who are going to rot becase they have no forgiveness in their hearts. Its easy to be forgiven...We dont know his heart. He may (IF HE IS GUILTY OF COURSE) have already made his peace with God. I pray harder for those then i do him.....

Name: Bill
Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:43:02 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Rachel and Christine, I'm sure you both feel stong in your convictions,as witnessed by your strong comments, and will remain so regardless what would be said. I'm sure both of you will become bleeding hearters that will write and send cards etc. to Scott (the convicted killer). However all the hoping and wishing for new trials and release are never going to happen. He should be gratefull that they have given him the DEATH PENALTY because that will keep him alive, knowing the state of california,forever. He will be kept in solitary while on death row(forever) and some day in 20 yrs. some liberal governor will commute him to life imprisonment. At that time some young buck will take his life and then justice will finally be served. Both of you will probably read about his demise while drinking your coffee in a nursing home and you will still be able to say "He was innocent".

Name: Christine
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:20:38 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Thank you Rachel you make some good points as well!!! I was heart broken when the jury reccomended death. He didn't deserve it because he didn't kill her! I believe that the cheers outside the courtroom when the verdict was announced were completly innappropriate. People let their hate get in the way of the actual facts and the truth. They let it mess with their perception and see only what they want to see. Scott Peterson is innocent and shouldn't have been on trial to begin with. This was an extremely unfair trial with an unfit jury. Don't get me wrong I feel for Laci's family too. Which is I why I believe they should start making a more thorough and truthful investigation to find the real killer. The Rochas and the Petersons deserve to know who the real killer is. Both families will be in my prayers including Scott Peterson. I will pray everyday that Scott Peterson be granted a second trial with a more open-minded jury as soon as possible. An innocent person is in jail!!

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:01:16 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You are most likely a man basher.....its a shame your hatefulness overshadows the facts of the case....Even the jurors couldnt come up with one peice of evidence that proved him guilty....Just a couple peices that they tried to peice together...Quit being so hateful. Scott didnt really want amber. He just wanted a peice....he only knew her for a few weeks. Hardley a motive for murder....PLUS she had a kid!

Name: Deserve
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:02:02 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Yeah right, let Scott free and Amber Fry will come a missing!

Name: rachel
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 8:12:50 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Amen Christine!! I agree 100% The man is innocent and the jury let their emotions play too high in this case....I really dont believe they went with the "facts" as there really was none pointing him to murder..Sure he was a cheater, and liar, but how many men, and now a days even women do the same thing??? Its not a basis for murder..I hope his new trial starts soon! I will pray that they base the next decision on the facts. The Peterson family and also Lacis family is in my prayers and I hope the true killer will be found.

Name: Christine
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 7:56:00 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is innocent beyond believe. 1. They based the case soley on the fact that nobody else couldv'e had a motive. 2. Yes he did like about the affair with Amber Fry but I'm sure a lot of people would've too. As soon as people knew of the affair they started speculating that he was guilty. 3. The verdict, prosecution, and conviction went about because he showed "no emotion". Everybody handles things differently. A lack of emotion should be no reason to believe that he's a monster. 4. One of the jurors wanted to vote not guilty in the case. But the other jurors messed up his car and such until he finally couldn't take it anymore, left the case, and had to be replaced. On this basis I also think that the other juror's votes were swayed into guilty, even though some probably didn't believe that he was guilty. 5. Someone is innocent until proven guilty. He went into the trial with many of the members of the court believing he was guilty. Thus making the whole trial a fact of just proving his innocence. 6. From the beginning her dissapearance was telivised as well as the law enforcements specualtions that Scott was responsible. Public opinion swayed this whole trial! It caused speculation in the media, the public, and in the courtroom! I never saw someone who believed he was innocent speak out on television!! That is the way I see it. I believe he is innocent and I hope his defense team is successful in filing an appeal and getting a new trial as soon as possible. Scott Peterson is innocent and should'nt be in jail.

Name: Marie
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:45:46 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is guilty. I think in fitting irony, He will be looking out over the Bay where he dumped his Wife and Child, for the rest of his life, or atleast until they inject the Bastard. I feel so bad for Laci's family, as well as Scott's family. What he has done to not only Laci and Conner, but his own family and Laci's family is unforgiveable. For those of you that believe he is innocent, did you actually gather any facts about the case? Did you listen to all of the evidence against him? As for Amber, she will recover and her life will go on. Maybe she will be more careful in the future as to who she brings into her life, as well as her daughters life. Laci and Conner are the real victims. How would any of us feel if it where our sister, or daughter, or family member that was preganant and killed by her husband.. The one human being that is supposed to protect his wife and unborn child. He got what he deserves. He will answer someday for his actions. In the meantime, I hope he hears Laci's voice in his head the rest of his natual life. I hope it drives him insane....Mercy for him? Hell no, did he show Mercy for Laci or Conner, or his family, or Laci's family? No...............

Name: Jane
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 6:41:19 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
stop being ridiculous.

Name: researcher
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 1:21:17 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Was Laci Peterson murdered by a Satanist(s)? All along, I sort of assume Scott Peterson is guilty. However, the more I researched into this case, the more troubling I find it. Please read with an open mind and lay aside any preconceived ideas you might have. Woman Claimed Satanist killed Laci May 22, 2003. KNBC-TV in Los Angeles reported that Scott's defense team had in protective custody a woman who called police to say she could clear Scott Peterson's name. The woman alleges that the deaths are linked to a satanic or cult killing and that "crazies" are involved, and is providing the defense with crucial information that may lead to the identification of Laci's murderer(s). What happened to her, anyone knows? Early on ,MSNBC news carried a statement that there are now suspicions that the murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn son, was a part of a Satanic ritual. Also a witness saw two men yelling at a woman in a park who could have been Laci that morning, could they have abducted her? ABC13.com, May 23, 2003. Modesto police received an anonymous tip that a satanic cult was operating out of Bill Austin's Modesto furniture store. Austin claimed he knew nothing about cults, but it turned out a Wicca group used his property for their meetings. There are a couple of known satanic cults in Modesto. A woman heard of plan to kill someone on Christmas ABCNews, June 4, 2003. A Modesto police report interviewed a rape counselor and police. The report reveals that a rape crisis counselor told investigators about a woman who said she was attacked in the area a week before the young pregnant woman went missing. The counselor told police the woman she helped said she had been attacked on Dec.18, by men carrying out some sort of ritual. The rape counselor said the woman explained that the man had bragged they would murder someone on Christmas Day. A suspicious Van spotted in neighborhood Fox News reported that the defense team was trying to locate a number of people in a brown van (supposed to do landscaping business) that neighbors of the Petersons told police about. The defense team believes these people in the van may be tied to a satanic cult. Sources told Fox News that the men and women in the van had no home address listed in the police reports and that they had no landscaping equipment in the van. Fox News has learned that a mystery woman claims she saw Laci being abducted by someone in that van. Anyone has more information on this van? Store Clerk said she saw Laci KSBW television news reported that Police Investigate Possible Laci sighting In Washington. "A grocery store clerk in Longview [Washington], said she thinks Laci Peterson came through her checkout line accompanied by an older man sometime in December. The clerk told authorities that when the man stepped out of line to get something, the woman told her she had been kidnapped and asked her to call police when they left. "A police report said the clerk intended to do that -- but got distracted and forgot. The clerk apparently recognized [Laci] Peterson from news reports and came forward last week." Body found in a place with Satanic paintings Laci’s body was found in Albany Marina’s Albany Bulb, where there are displays of paintings Some of the artwork features decapitation and devil figures. Many of the paintings portray sexual activity, and several show pregnant women. Occult numerology It was discovered on 4-14-2004. In occult numerology, dates are significant. They add up the numbers like this. 4 plus 1+4=9, which is a most important Satanic number. If you add the year also, it is 15. 5+1=6, another occult number. If Laci was killed on 12-24-2004, you find the same numbers. Serial killer or pure co-incidence? There were puzzling disappearances of many young women in northern California: Tom Monahan is a Lieutenant in the police force who is in charge of the kidnapping and murder investigation of Ladonna Milam, 49. She was abducted and dismembered and parts of her body were found in a fishing pond, one day after her disappearance. They caught the suspect Perry Monroe of Alameda, California and found a hacksaw and a pair of hands in his car! (San Francisco Chronicle, July 5, 2003). Perry C. Monroe was a student at the University of California Davis, and as the Modesto Bee reported parts of dismembered bodies were discovered in a trash bin in Davis. The body parts were from 4 or 5 different bodies. Perry lives in Alameda, which is close to Richmond, where Laci’s body was found. There are similarities between the murder of Ladonna Milam and Laci Peterson. Why hasn’t anyone seriously investigated this? Ladonna Milam was physically similar to Laci Peterson . The body of Laci was decapitated and found without hands; neither her hands nor her head have yet been recovered. Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera reported that Laci 's body had been extensively mutilated, and that some of her internal organs or body parts had been removed. Satanists believe if a person is beheaded, he cannot be resurrected! Could Perryl Monroe has information pertaining to the Peterson case ? Five of the following women were pregnant, and six lived within the area Perry Monroe frequented, short driving distances from Perry's home town. It is known that Laci Peterson, Evelyn Hernandez, and Angelina Joy wore tattoos on their ankles. It is a pretty big coincidence! 24 year old Evelyn Hernandez from El Salvador went missing in San Francisco, with her five year old son. Like Laci, She was eight months' pregnant at the time. Her body was eventually discovered, as it washed ashore in the bay. Her son remains missing. Laci’s son washed up on the shore in the bay area. The very fact that Laci disappeared on Christmas eve ought to have prompted an extensive review of the practices of Satanic cults and devil-worshipping but it didn't. Some Satanic cults like to kill and sacrifice people to blaspheme Christmas.Could a Satanic cult have picked Laci as a target for a Christmas-time Satanic ritual murder. Let us consider geographic coordinates: Modesto California is at: 121 degrees. Could Satanist be using &; distorting Rev. 12:1, which says,” And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: verse 2 says And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. Revelation 12:4 passage above the red dragon, who is Satan, devours the child as it is born. Could a Satanic cult have picked a city with ,they think, a Satanic ring or interpretation to it? In the movie "The Seventh Sign", where Demi Moore plays a woman pregnant with child, whose pregnancy is connected in this movie with the End of the World signs in the Book of Revelation; Remember Congressional intern Chandra Levy? Also of Modesto- She was an intern of Modesto Congressman Gary Condit. Note that both of these women, Laci and Chandra, are from the small city of Modesto.Condit was allegedly bisexual and into prostitution. Then there are similarities to the JonBenet Ramsey murder case in Colorado in 1996. The Ramsey girl was murdered on Christmas. There is indication her death is linked to a child porn ring. A confidential informant contacted the rumor Mills News that he had just told the FBI in New York that the Christmas-time torture and murder of Jon Benet Ramsey was planned, conducted and video-taped by Satanists in a neo-Nazi cell in Colorado. Little said about the disappearance of many other women in Modesto Evelyn Jones: missing after December 5th of 2002. Note several missing before Christmas. Maria Dolores Rosales- missing in Modesto for nearly eight and 1/4 years: Like Maribel Nieves and Laci Peterson, Maria was an extremely attractive young woman. She was 31 at the time of her disappearance. Dena Raley McCluskey was reported missing in Modesto on October 10th, 1999, then aged 36 and eight months pregnant: to be sacrificed during Halloween? She Was a Modesto cheerleader. Rebekah Rachel Miller -- A homeless woman in Modesto went missing on or about October 15th, 12 blocks from Laci’s home! Sylvia Lourdes Standly- missing in Modesto just weeks shy of her 32nd birthday. Many of the women who have gone missing in northern California, Oregon and Washington State have been short and beautiful. A month earlier, Susan Robin Bender disappeared in Modesto : she was less than 16. Audrey May (Turk) Herron - missing, height 5'0" Vanessa Dawn Smith - missing in Modesto in 97: 15 year-old student In October 1999. pregnant Michelle Chan of Fremont, CA, disappeared. Police never found her. (Sacramento Bee). Alice Sin Missing from Pinole, California in 1999, she was pregnant and the mother of a one year old boy. Maribel Nieves Gone missing on December 20, 2001(before Christmas) in California. Angelina Joy Evans Missing in 2001, from Sacramento: 8 months pregnant,. When are the media going to start connecting the dots asking the tough questions? Someone said the only reason law enforcement would have for hiding these murders is if Mr. Monroe was a subject in some kind of nefarious government mind-control experiment. Some smell a stench to the highest heaven. Satanist seen in video? MSNBC, in providing coverage of the jury deliberations repeatedly ran a tape segment from their archives which showed Laci and her brother at a garden party of some kind, at the end of this video segment there's 10-12 seconds of images of a young woman dressed in black. She is seated at a table and appears to make a satanic symbol of two horns, with her right hand. MSNBC has never commented on this. Laci a Satanist? On the A&;E special on Laci, they showed a picture of her at Downey High School in Modesto. She was with a number of her friends and most or all of them were flashing the satanic hand salute. Laci ended up as a student at Cal Poly, where stories of a satanic cult abducting and sacrificing female students has been reported for years. The Modesto-Merced-Yosemite area is a center of Satanic activities Several years ago, three tourists were kidnapped in Yosemite. Questions of their fate gripped the nation for weeks. After the bodies of two of the victims were found, they had been beheaded. Months later, another murder was committed in Yosemite. The murdered woman was also beheaded. Yosemite is approximately 30 miles from Merced. In Merced, a Delhi teen-ager beheaded his mother. Merced is the district Congressman Gary Condit represented. Condit's brother is a Modesto County Sheriff. It is theorized that there is either a Satanic cult, or a mind-control operation, or a pedophile operation, or a combination of all three going on there. This area has been nicknamed the Bermuda Triangle of evil. A researcher said the Modesto-Yosemite area is the nexus of a government operation that includes drugs, mind control, cults involving high level government officials. In the early 90s there were some murders associated with a satanic cult operating out of Salida, which is about 7 miles NW of Modesto. Daniel Ryder has written a book on satanic ritual abuse: “... Satanic cults are somewhat similar to Mafia crime families. There is extreme secrecy through code of silence. Four California Satanic cult defectors met death one fateful night in 1990. The defectors were tracked to an apartment in Salida. The defectors were beaten, stabbed and also decapitated. The trail led to five Satanic cult members who were indicted. They were part of a 55-member Satanic cult that was operating out of a compound in Salida. Cult members stretched across a three-county area. Randy Cerny, Director of the Northern Chapter of California’s Ritual Crime Investigators Association interviewed several cult members. He said the cult worshipped Satan, followed the teachings of renowned Satanist Aleister Crowley, engaged in sexual abuse, ritual torture “The California cult was a very secretive, close-knit, sophisticated group," The Satanic cult was run under the iron fist of charismatic leader, high priest, Gerald Cruz. Cruz used brainwashing, torture...to keep members in line. At a trial in Oakland in December, 1992, cult expert and psychologist, Daniel Goldstine, would characterize Cruz as "evil and sadistic." The jury thought so too. Cruz and two other cult members were sentenced to death for the murders. Two other cult members got life ...but what happened to the other 46 members of the Salida satanic cult? Was Scott Peterson guilty, an accomplice or framed? Some people have speculated that Scott Peterson belonged to a satanic club at the college he attended in San Luis Obispo. The local officials will do nothing about it. Did he promise to a cult that he will sacrifice his first born but then reneged? Crucial questions about Peterson case If he murdered Laci for the life insurance, then why didn’t he buy a million dollars policy? Since Laci was about to inherit part of her grandparents 2.4 million estate, which Scott would not receive with Laci dead. Why would Scott murder Laci for a $250,000 life insurance policy when he could have 2.4 million? It makes no sense. Here are the statistics for female victims being killed. Here is the breakdown: 35% acquaintances 31% at the hands of a stranger 28% intimates (boyfriend or husband) 5% other relatives According to these numbers, Scott is 3rd in line for statistical probability. Was baby killed after birth? Don't you think it is strange that she was supposedly killed when seven and a half months pregnant and then they find a full term baby? like the perpetrator(s) wanted it to have been born before it was killed (for sacrifice?) Was Laci Peterson kidnapped, held incommunicado until the baby was at or almost at full-term, and then murdered? If so, that requires an enormous amount of planning by a person or persons unknown, and some financial support. Laci would have to be well-cared for over most of those fifty-two days! Would Scott dare to escape the scrutiny of the police investigators, reporters and the world to go to the place where Laci was held, to kill her and the baby? Satanic ritual- is it for real? Susan Ware, Globe Correspondent in November 13, 2004 reported: ‘A mother came to a church in her pajamas, police said, and made a gruesome request: She wanted to sacrifice one of her children. Nicole Mancini, 29, and her boyfriend, John Thurber, 35, walked into Saint Mary Church in Rochester, N.H., with her three children with the intention of sacrificing one of them on the altar, police said. Prosecutors say they believe Mancini and Thurber were serious enough that they are seeking to charge the pair with attempted murder. "The kids -- boys ages 9, 7, and 1 were very shaken up." Will the full truth about Scott and Laci Peterson ever be known?

Name: Jane
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 1:00:48 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Of course he killed her. Death penalty? Deserve? These words don't go together. If one is of the opinion that the death penaty should not be an option, it is still a matter of course that Peterson should receive life in prison without parole, as he has been convicted of the crime for which he stood trial, and the punishment for that crime is either death or life in prison without parole. ACCORDING TO A JURY OF HIS PEERS WHO JUDGED HIM ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCE PRESENTED, HE KILLED HIS WIFE FOR HIS OWN GAIN. THAT IS, UNDER THE RULE OF LAW, A CRIME THAT IS PUNISHABLE BY DEATH, OR BY IMPRISONMENT FOR THE TERM OF LIFE. NO MORE TO DISCUSS. however, whether or not the death penalty is a viable option for our society IS a matter for discussion. FORGET THIS GUY. HE IS AN EMBODIMENT OFWHAT WE, AS A SOCIETY, FIND UNACCEPTABLE. he's finished. move on, and please be aware that men kill their pregnant wives with alarming regularity. if the notoriety of this case serves to alert that this crime is committed, then so be it. FORGET THIS GUY.

Name: BABY GIRL
Date: Monday, December 13, 2004 6:30:30 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Who are we to judge a person? To determine whether they should live or die? Who gave us that rightful authority to make that judgement, or bestowed that point of duty upon us. Isn't the person, who is administering the letal drug, is as a big of a murder as Scott Peterson and any other murders whom receive the death penality. People are rejoicing to the fact that he was found guilty, and is already condemning him to death, but never stop to think that that could have been their dad, uncle, cousin, brother. We should all stop to think that taking another mans life will not bring back the person whom he took from our family. I cannot judge Scott Peterson or any body else for that matter. I cannot say that he is guilty because i was not there, i wasn't in the court room to evaluate his every action, the only thing i can say that if he did it, that the lord would have mercy on his soul. He sees and knows every thing. Lacy was just one of the unfortunate ones. May her soul find rest.

Name: DumbASS Jr. III
Date: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:55:03 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I'm glad I know that Scott is guilty. They didn't slant anything on TV and put forth all the evidence for both sides. Now they tell me that convictions based on circumstantial evidence are beyond a reasonable doubt. I'm glad. TV is always right. I can't wait until everyone goes into court guilty and has to prove they are innocent...not just Peterson. That'll make for some good TV watching! Of course, most of you (my fellow dumbasses) don't realize that you can't prove yourself innocent and that's why the current law says you have to be PROVEN guilty. Oh well..... why is this such a high profile case? Stuff like this happens everyday? Could it be that the news is entertainment and the entertainment is news? Something more? Bernays? Hmmm.... I'm just too much of a dumbass to know.

Name: N/A
Date: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:42:30 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
GOT WHAT HE DESERVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LETS WATCH HIM DIE!!!!!! UNLESS A PRISONER KILLS HIM WITH A BROOMSTICK FIRST!

Name: Josh K.
Date: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:41:32 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
It's a sad, sad day. Today an innocent man was recomended to die by 12 "unbiased" peers. This not only shows the tragedy of our legal system, but the tragedy of all America. An online reader poll on CBS.com showed that 75% of readers agreed with the jury verdict. How can 75% of America agree with a verdict when they have heard very few facts from the case? Were they in the courtroom? At the murder scene? No. This country is intent on providing this male as some sacrifice to the unholy god of our nation. Wise up America. This is a murder case, yes, but would you want to be convicted of ANY crime that you didn't commit? This could come back to haunt us all. If anyone knows of a website or something where the American people can petition for a re-trial or at the least save Scott's life please post the info. Im sure if we could manage to gather thousands of signatures we could petition to the judge or a higher court to reconsider. Thank you all for your help.

Name: Lynne
Date: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:30:58 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I don't think he did it. It is too convenient for them to convict Peterson. The authorities looked at him and wanted to find any way to pin the guilt on him. The husband did it, he had an affair, he lied. That makes him guilty in their mind so therefore the case was practically closed. Amber Frey should have been looked at more carefully, the surrounding area where Laci and Conner were found should have been examined more carefully. I think that the verdict and the sentence was wrong. Even if the guilty verdict stood, give him life. Death is the easy way out. If someone lives with the guilt, I think that is way worse than dying. I have a gut feeling he did not do it. As for facial expressions, Scott knew what the press and the prosecution was looking for. So, he gave it to them. What good would it have done to go on sobbing and looking all sad. The prosecution had their minds set on what they wanted. Why not give them what they want? He didn't do it.

Name: George Bush
Date: Monday, December 13, 2004 9:24:29 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
We have seen the worst that this person has to offer. Scott needs to see his maker and the death penalty is the only way he can meet him. We do not need a phsyco living among us. I support the death sentance for this stupid idiot 1000000%. May Scott burn in hell for his acts.

Name: Deanna
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2004 8:42:35 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
They say that the American Justice System is the most just.....WRONG! Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.....where is the evidence. How can anyone say that Scott is guility without evidence. Now, we wait as a group of clueless people debate the fact whether he should live or die....how sare they. God can judge...not you. I SUPPORT SCOTT PETERSON 100%.

Name: rachel
Date: Friday, December 10, 2004 11:00:26 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Well, its your local community police that helped make this case the spectacle that it is...Did the PD make amber fry do a press conference? Nope, but they let her put it out there for the whole world to see. Blame it on your towns local law enforcement. Anyway, i feel for Lacis family and her unborn baby...Really i do...I just think they got the wrong guy...Everyone wants to say there is so much evidnece pointing to him..What about the evidence pointing AWAY from him?? Everyone seems to forget about that part of the case. How convenient for people who want to see this man fry for something that he has not been proven to have done.

Name: Amanda
Date: Friday, December 10, 2004 8:14:37 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
All of you who are talking about this blaming the PD for the mistakes.. well guess what there is a lot more than any of you know. Scott did have his justice in court, just like every other person will. I live right by the town they lived in and I just want to say that I believe that Scott did it and you know what he acted stupid about it. I don't believe that he did it intentionally I think she found out about Amber and they got in an argument and he freaked out and ended up accidently killing her. He doesn't deserve death, he deserves to stay in his jail cell for the rest of this life. Yes he will appeal a million and one times taking more money out of my community and surrounding communities. This case just needs to settle down and let what's done be done. Honestly, why does this guy have you on his side? How come the whole world knows about this fertilizer sales men? There are a billion and one murders out there, but everyone has to stick up for this scum bag. He did it and Yes, justice was served.

Name: jack
Date: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:45:42 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
All of you that believe Scott is guilty are blinded by the fact that you want justice for Laci and Connor. I do too, trust me. I'm a mother myself. You can't say that he's a murderer just because he was unfaithful to his wife with some whore. It makes him a slut, not a murderer. There are so many leads out there pointing the direction of innocence for Scott. I agree with the poster before me. there's something about him that tells me he's innocent. i'm not exactly sure what it is but it's something. I feel so much for their families, and I believe the jury is wrong. justice for everyone is needed, but some people have to suffer for other people's idiocy. like scott.

Name: rachel
Date: Thursday, December 09, 2004 9:15:18 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Well, i guess we will soon find out whether Scott will get the death penalty...I hope he doesnt.. Does anyone know how appeals work? Does he have a chance for a new trial with a new jury on appeal?? Something about this man tells me he is innocent...My mind and heart just cant accept he is guilty. And i am a firm believer in punishing someone for harming a child especially.....Lets all pray for the right outcome.

Name: Al
Date: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 8:29:55 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I think all the evidence pointed to Peterson. I do think he is guilty. Athough there is really not hard core evidence to prove it! He really deserves life in prison. To kill him would only punish his family (especially his parents). Killing someone convicted of a crime such as murder only relieves them of the punishment. For him to spent the next 30 or 40 years of his life in a cell is just punishment. I don't believe in the death penalty.

Name: rachel
Date: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:28:20 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I think a new law should be made that if someone goes on trial, the media be gagged....They put too much speculation and hype on innocent people. I think it should be illegal for the media to discuss cases like this.. Especially ones that determine the fate of someones life. I too think that Scotts stone face is due to him not feeling guilty becuase HE ISNT!!!! You dont cry and look guilty when you arent.

Name: Dee
Date: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 3:45:10 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I can't help but still feel (regardless of the verdict) that scott is 100% innocent of this crime, I agree that he could not have possibly did this crime and there be no damning evidence...he was far too dumb to be chatting on the phone if he just pre meditated a murder. if he had someone do it, that would be the explanation for all the money in his possession. He naturally can't say "hey, i paid someone" All those court tv anchors think every single defendent on trial is guilty. They never ever once spoke about possibly being innocent, I will feel terrible if they find he didn't do it. Scott didn't need to show so much emotion if he wasn't an "emotional type" I have loving family members who would have acted the same way, very stone faced......So now what?

Name: rachel
Date: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:46:16 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I totally agree wtih you! Scott is innocent. As for Court TV....Nancy Grace is a DISGRACE....have you ever watched that woman?? She just has WITCH stamped on her forehead. I think the media is a HUGE factor in this case..Do you really beleive that the jurors would go home each night and honestly not watch Court TV about the case?? I doubt it...The media decided the fate of this man and I feel really sorry for Scott and his family.... As for the officer earlier, i understand there are alot of scums out there, but that is the mind of an officer and prosecutors. EVERYONE IS SCUMS FIRST! They are so hip on burning someone that they only look at things that might not look good on a defendent in a case. I hope something good comes out of this for scott and his family...

Name: Michael
Date: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:57:00 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I believe Scott is innocent. Not one piece of truly damning evidence has been brought forward, and certainly no forensic evidence. We've been told there is circumstantial evidence. Well...there is circumstantial evidence in every murder case because "circumstantial evidence" is open to interpretation and many people can interpret this so called evidence in many different ways. Evidence should be damning before someone is convicted of a crime and sentenced to death. I too wondered why Scott didn't show much emotion and then I concluded that perhaps he is compeltely dumbfounded with what has happened. He probably can't believe what has transpired this past year. If he is truly innocent, he must be in shock. Let's face it, at a minimum, he has to be embarrassed that his dirty laundry, i.e., affairs, have become public knowledge. It seems to me that if you are beging tried for a crime with the potential for a lot of media scrutiny, then you are totally screwed.

Name: Byrda
Date: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 11:14:39 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Then officer, I ask you this, show us the proof. So far what we have seen does not prove Scott Peterson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. And, guilty or not, according to our constitution each of us should be ensured of a fair and honest trial. This was a Kangaroo trial and he was hung by the news media. You have Court TV sitting outside the court house doing nothing more than slandering Scott and his family. They caused the lynching and denied him his right to a fair trial. As far as circumstantial evidence, a good investigator and/or officer could make anyone out to be the guilty party if they had a mind set. For violation of civil rights issues, the Petersons should sue Court TV, the procustion and Amber Frey's attorney too. The maddness won't stop until honest investiagting is done (and I have seen many an officer who thought they were above the law, no offence). DA's need to start applying charges fairly and reasonably and the media needs to report both sides. Then and only then will corruption and wrongly charged end. At the rate CA is going it won't be too long before everyone is either a prisoner or a prison guard. Is Scott innocent, I don't know, but I do know he will never be able to have a fair trial anywhere in the US. Thanks Court TV. . .

Name: Officer
Date: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:07:32 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
As a police officer, I have an inside look at this case. What I can honestly tell you is he is, without a doubt, guilty of murdering his wife. The sad thing is that the criminal justice system only allows the prosecuter to introduce 75% of the facts surrounding this case. Well, in that 25% that is thrown away due to defense tactics and pre-trial motions, could hang him. That is the job of a defense attorney, to create doubt, doubt that you all feel. Trust me. The man is guilty, and he deserves to be punished for what he did. He thought it was a "perfect" murder, but it was clearly not.

Name: rachel
Date: Sunday, December 05, 2004 7:54:57 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I guess i just thought that you were innocent until proven guilty. Circumstantial evidence has turned out to be wrong in the past....I hear of too many stories where people spend years in jail based on circumstantial evidence. If i am ever placed on a jury, i am sorry, but i cannot ruin a persons life unless i am convinced with FACTUAL proof that that person committed a crime. Circumstantial evidence doesnt work for me....Whether he did it or not, i dont really know. I dont think any of us will ever really know. I just dont believe he did it. Some call me dumb, but I just go with what i believe.

Name: Scott&;apos;s a gone-er!!
Date: Sunday, December 05, 2004 12:02:06 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I understand that some people might have the reasonable doubt thing going on, but you can't honestly say that he's been proven "innocent" can you? You may not have heard concrete physical evidence but you also didn't hear any evidence that would even hint at him being innocent.

Name: Steve
Date: Saturday, December 04, 2004 5:37:16 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
You werent asked to convict Scott Peterson.....his jury was.....AND THEY DID. GUILTY AS CHARGED. I only hope it was worth it Scott. Have fun in San Quentin!!! Say hi to the boys for us!!!

Name: rachel
Date: Saturday, December 04, 2004 12:44:19 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Prove it! I dont see the proof. I cant convict someone with out Hard proof and i am sorry, but there just isnt any.

Name: Scott&;apos;s a gone-er!!
Date: Friday, December 03, 2004 8:22:29 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I can't possibly imagine what the odds are that all these things could happen to this "poor" guy that would make him look so guilty. C'mon! Maybe one or two things but not hundreds! He did it!!

Name: rachel
Date: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:13:47 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I am so saddened by the guilty verdict of Scott Peterson. I wish there was an address or something so we could write to him or his family and give them our support. This poor man, who i believe is totally innocent sees that so many people hate him. I feel sorry for him. Justice was not served here. I thought you were innocent until proven guilty. I followed this case from beginning to end and I never saw or heard of one solid peice of evidence that linked him to the crime. I do not believe in our system. Its a joke. If he was guilty, there would be SOMETHING to say he did it. There is nothing. My thoughts and prayers are with both families. I do feel bad for Lacis family as she was so beautiful and the poor little baby, but they got the wrong guy. I feel it in my heart. I hope his appeals will tell the truth and let him go free!

Name: Scott's a gone-er!!
Date: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:04:52 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I prayed for an acquittal--------He wouldn't survive 24 hours---------now I pray for life. Can you imagine what is going to happen to a pretty, wine drinking, golf playing, pansy ass in prison?? He'll be praying for death!

Name: Robyn
Date: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 2:29:32 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I feel 100% that Scott killed Lacie. He only cares about himself. Look at the lies, pain, hurt and the cost he has put his parents through. Do they deserve this? Look what he has put Sharon Rocha through. Sharon is a very strong woman. If I had been that close to my daughters killer, I am afraid my hands would have been around his neck. If my only daughter is dead, what do I have to live for? Death would be to good for Scott. I think he should spend the rest of his natural life in prison. Freedom meant so much to him, so not being FREE will punish him, more than we will ever know. It is just a shame this even had to happen.

Name: Bill
Date: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:48:44 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I'm hoping the jury will have sympathy for scott and just give him life . I only wish that we all would be able to see the FUN he will have everyday with his,also innocent,prison mates. Good luck Scottie.

Name: DEFENDING SCOTT
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:31:03 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
The prosecutors allege that Scott Peterson murdered Laci in their home. They claim that Scott murdered Laci in the bedroom by either suffocating or strangling her. That he would have had the body in the house for the entire night before he left to dispose of it the next morning. They suggest that he pulled off the perfect crime and left no trace evidence of her murder anywhere in the house, his truck, or the boat. That he was able to clean up every bit of evidence normally found at any crime scene within hours of the police arriving. According to the prosecution's theory Scott Peterson managed to clean up this crime scene without using any bleach. Remember, it is the prosecution that claims this is where Laci Peterson was murdered. My first question to you is what happens almost immediately after anyone dies? The prosecution contends that Scott used his boat to take Laci’s body out in the bay and dumped it overboard. Look at the size of the boat. Can you imagine driving to a boat launch and taking Laci’s body out of a tool box from the back of your truck? Then the prosecution alleges that Scott loaded the body on to his boat without one person seeing him or the body in broad daylight. Most of you have seen how small this boat is. The sides maybe come up between 20-32 inches. The boat is 14 feet long with three rows of seats within the boat. Placing a pregnant woman’s body within this boat without anyone being able to see her would be a Houdini type feat. Scott Peterson was charged because of public pressure to get someone. Scott Peterson was charged because nobody likes him. Scott Peterson was stopped and arrested because he was flipping off the police that were following him.

Name: Suzi
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:27:58 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Jesus, Kelly...why do all you "pro peterson did it" get so offensive.....You seem like the lynch mob out front of the court. Get a grip...so what if we think he didn't do it! we're entitled to our opinion ...if you can't argue in a civilised way then don't bother wasting your anger on those who think otherwise...come up with an argument or something!

Name: kelly
Date: Friday, November 26, 2004 4:31:34 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I don't understand what it takes for some of you morons to believe in someones guilt. I'm so glad none of you idiots were on the jury. Scott is exactly where he should be. If it were up to you a wife murderer and baby killer would be free. Shame on you!

Name: domestic violence expert
Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:45:55 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Wake up and smell the excrement, you chest-thumping blind sheep. From the very beginning, this narcissistic overblown moron was broadcasting that he did it. How can I be so sure? Easy. Like the rest of the killers and would-bes that I prosecuted, his arrogance was surpassed only by his stupidity. Justice has been served.

Name: nick Johnson
Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:17:55 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I really think he shold be saved for a 2 mile swim with 50 pounds of weight strapped around his neck

Name: jason
Date: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:54:18 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
do you know about the fugitive the doctor who was accused of killing his wife and find innocent after years in prison. i think this justice is doing the same mistake. and this time an innocent guy is going to die. the da knows it. the president of the court knows it. the jurors know it but someone for an unclear purpose wants peterson dead.

Name: jojo
Date: Sunday, November 21, 2004 2:53:37 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
The Peterson trail ran like the Witch Hunts they had in New England. It, a very sad situation. I still think she was snatched off the street or in her home(did they have ADT?) No mention was ever said if they had an alarm system. I hope they find the real truth in this case. It is truly a shame if an innocent person takes the blame.

Name: Travis
Date: Saturday, November 20, 2004 9:14:40 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
This man is innocent. The Modesto Police Department is completly incompetent. They wanted to nail Scott, because they had no other leads. There was no where else to go. And by the way, Scott wouldn't kill Laci over Amber, he gave every apperance that he wanted to break up with Amber. He kept telling her he was in Europe, and to busy, just completely blowing her off. And why the hell did the police not listen to the lady who said she saw Laci walk her dog? Because the wanted Scott Peterson to fry, that's why. They didn't want to let him get away, no matter if he was innocent or not, they found who they wanted, and nothing was going to stop them. Scott fled, because he realized that he was about to get rolled on. That he was getting framed, by the POLICE. And then one of the jurors that got kiced out, complains that he was getting intimidated into voting guilty. The one juror has a conscience, and what does the jury do? It simply gets him kicked out, the new juror comes in with the assumption of guilt, votes that way, and Scott gets screwed over. Also, to all those people who sat outside the courtroom and cheered when Scott got found guilty, how sadstic are you? I mean, him getting found guilty doesn't solve anything. People like that need to seek professional help. Unfortuantly, it was people like that sitting in the jury box. People who didn't like Scott because he cheated on his wife. They're like well if he lied about cheating on his wife, then he must of have lied about killing her too. I still mantain that, had he not cheated on his wife, he would've been found guilty, Because then people would've looked at the evidence, found how bad it was, and found him innocent. Instead, they looked at him cheating on his wife, and never bothered to look at the shakey, at best, evidence.

Name: Brandy
Date: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:24:43 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is sooooo not guilty. I can't see how in there right minds a jury would find him guilty. I hope to God he doesn't get life.

Name: MYOB
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2004 3:32:03 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I don't think Scott Peterson did it, either. I know it looks like it, but no other domestic murder with nazi low riders, burglary, break-ins, so many witnesses ignored, detectives giving conflicting testimony/doctoring records to fit their theory/stealing gun the first night, etc. No way...No evidence at house, warehouse, truck, or boat. Dogs can track all the way to marina, but couldn't track anyone like chandra levy, elizabeth smart, dru sjodin, etc? no way. 1995 FBI study: out of 145 pregnant murders, 141 killed by women. In this case, no answer to where, how, when, or why. Changing theories of poisoning, blunt trauma, strangulation, smothering. Larry Flint said Amber was an escort. They haven't sued him and don't know of any settlement. Hooked up with another man within weeks. Female witness saw and reported medina home burglared on 12/24..hypnotized, so couldn't testify. Raft in Bay with no lights/man in wetsuit at 3:30 a.m. 2 weeks before bodies found. 2 weeks after due date. reported to Homeland Defense. Conclusion: "commuter" Trying to get hit by a ship or boat?? please.. Who is Skeeter? Why didn't police attempt to find him? no composite of him in any newspaper..Dirty had no alibi, matching van! Passed polygraph by PI...what is this P.I.'s connection to Amber Frey and MPD, if any? too many weird things...too much money spent...I think he is innocent. My guess: Skeeter is DEA. They didn't warn Laci. Scott set it up/backed out. They did it anyway. Dept. of Justice to blame. Skeeter disappeared. Laughing?...don't bother. Just explain all the weirdness surrounding one simple domestic murder.

Name: JoJoFox
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:47:35 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott is the victim of an single focused law enforcement effort. How many more incidents of padding evidence and excluding information needed to be exposed to reveal that the entire investigation was a :scott-hunt' from the beginning? I find a serious lack of attention to the following situations..... 1) the possibility of foul play occurring in Laci and Scott's crime ridden neighborhood was more then VERY likely.....and especially since Laci had been confrontational to vagrants.....she most certainly could have met her demise at the hands of these. Seems there was sooo much criminal activity touching their lives: the breakins, the robberies, the thefts, the suspicious characters......Damn if my neighborhood had that amount of criminal activity, I would move ! And still Scott was the only suspect ????That is unforgiveable. 2) The ten minute window of time that was mapped out by the investigators as the ONLY time foul play could have occurred to Laci (10:08 to 10:18) has a very serious flaw. Consistnetly through various testimonies is the fact that no one's time frame matches the Sub station used to track Scott's cell. It appears that consistently the times reported by witnesses (Sharon Rocha, Neighbors, etc) do not match the sub stations.....there apprears to be a 20-30 min error.....Mr Geragos mentioned this but did not elaborate..and He needed to highlight this , repeat it and emphasize it to the MAX.! Add 20-30 minutes to the window of time and it is clear the Scott did indeed leave the home at 9:30 ish.......The window is now 45 minutes.and that would be more than enough time for Laci to mop, walk the dog and be seen by witnesses and abducted ...Yet the Prosecution stuck to the 10 minute window theory. 3) How thoroughly was Laci's substitute teaching assignments investigated ?As a substitute for Philad Schools and Suburban schools i can attest to the often open hostility a substitute encounters. My car was vandalized and I was verbally threatened..A very visual pregnancy could be the center of quite a few perverse comments and actions......not always overt...could a wacko student have been at fault. It is a possiblity....It certainly would have been a possiblity if I had mysteriously met my demise. Was this connection ever investigated.....did anyone speak to the students....Evidentally Laci taught in a variety of schools coming in contact with a wide variety of students...normal and abnormal. I only hope that more investigation continues....and that the real story comes to light...that the real killers are discovered. I do not believe the verdict convicted the right person....Scott did not do this deed...the prosecution's evidence paints a very vague picture at best...no one should be executed based on a very vague picture. How, where, when , why and with what....way too much speculation, not enough proof. I only hope Scott can maintain his sanity through this horrendous ordeal. I will continue to follow this case. It is not yet over....not by a long shot.

Name: J
Date: Monday, November 15, 2004 4:05:02 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
That the prosecution's version of events seems like a masterful crime to you folks does not speak well for your own intelligence. If Peterson did the job as the prosecution says he did, then I'm surprised he can even eat pudding without a helmet. No physical evidence? Bodies at the scene of his fishing trip? lol To be placed by police at the scene equals "drat! foiled again," but to actually volunteer the information freely is severe retardation. And this is just the beginning of the guy's incompetence (if he did what the prosecution says). To see you all squinting and scratching your chins over his masterful scheme makes me laugh.

Name: Steve K
Date: Sunday, November 14, 2004 12:30:03 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Just a quick message, you people are seriously retarded, do us all a favor and dont think too much!

Name: fiona elise madrigal
Date: Saturday, November 13, 2004 7:25:40 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I think scott petersen is so stupid that he could not have committed this crime- he is a moron- and only a smart criminal mind could have done this and not left any physical evidence- this is the usa- what happened to justice-why not look for the real killers- the smart ones who framed him? This guy is too damn dumb to get the credit for the crimes- I think it is a set up. If you look at the dumb stuff he did- with the hose bag girlfriend- it is beyond dumb- someone who commits a crime like this would not use a string of sluts as a motive- he is a creep, I wil grant you that, but way too dumb to pull this off.

Name: SUPPORT PERSON FOR SCOTT
Date: Saturday, November 13, 2004 1:15:21 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
SCOTT IS INNOCENT AND SUFFERING FOR THE HANDS OF ANOTHER......I HOPE NOTHING LIKE THIS EVER HAPPENS TO THE PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT SCOTT COMMITTED THESE MURDERS....

Name: from my perspective
Date: Friday, November 12, 2004 9:52:27 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
north seg (north block of san quentin) is not a friendly, healthy environment and I got to go home everyday.......................................................

Name: O.J. Simpson
Date: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:28:32 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I told that muthafucka to hire Cockran but the nigga said that would be to obvious , I say fuck that get some money and pay for the good lawyers now the poor little dude is gonna fry.

Name: Tracy
Date: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:48:16 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
For once...Justice worked. In my case...the people who tried to kill me were set free to retaliate until the trial. Thank god I am here but only because I survived an incredible beating and strangulation. This man lost his mind in a rage and for selfish reasons that he will have to live with for the rest of his life...killled his wife AND newborn baby. I hope he rots with that thought for the rest of his life.

Name: Corinn
Date: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:43:19 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I'm glad this scum bag didn't walk. I hope he fries

Name: Pissed
Date: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:08:28 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
This site pisses me off. Peterson is an ass! This murderer deserves everything that he is going to get when he is convicted. FUCK SCOTT PETERSON!!!

Name: CHRISTY
Date: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:04:36 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I HOPE SCOTT PETERSON WILL ROT IN HELL! I THINK HE DID IT, AND SO DOES 3/4 OF THE POPULATION....THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT THIS ASS, YOU WANT CONCRETE EVIDENCE? HOW ABOUT GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BAY AND FIND YOUR DAMN CONCRETE AROUND LACI'S NECK.......IT DOES NOT TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO FIGURE THIS ONE OUT, HE KILLED THEM, BOTH OF THEM.....FOR ALL THE SCOTT PETERSON BELIEVER'S KEEP SENDING HIM MAIL TO THE JAIL, HE SHOULD BE THERE FOR LIFE SO FLOOD HIS DAMN JAIL CELL WITH ALL YOUR BULL CRAP! HE CAN TAKE IT WITH....I HOPE CALIFORNIA LAWS WILL TIE SOMETHING AROUND HIS NECK AND DUMP HIM IN THE BAY, FORGET THE TAX PAYERS PAYING FOR IT TO BE DONE.....

Name: Bill
Date: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:02:25 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Accoording to the latest it looks promising for a hung jury in this trial. California has got to be the judicial laughing stock of the country. Their investigation and prosecution in major cases is abominable. They will soon be able to use the investigation team of Simpson,Petersen and Blake to help them solve major crimes.Who would be better to give suggestions on criminal deceit. What will be the next big case?

Name: Alicia
Date: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 5:12:52 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
For all you vegetables who believe in your hearts that Scott Peterson is guilty, ponder this: The prosecutor in his rebuttal said that it is ridiculous that someone else would dump Laci and Conner's bodies in the Bay to frame Scott Peterson. Really, it's ridiculous? According to who? The f***ing prosecutor who used perjured testimony from the police and who changed his theory every 5 minutes since the evidence didn't fit the crime? Get real you morons! If the thugs who robbed the neighbors wanted to throw suspicion away from themselves of course they would make Scott Peterson look guilty as all hell by dumping the bodies in the Bay. The prosecutor wants the jury not to think. That maltheseance is grounds for criminal charges against the prosecutor. Modesto's prosecutors are a bunch of losers. They all deserve to be charged with criminal misconduct for willfully charging Scott Peterson on zero evidence.

Name: Rick
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2004 7:12:55 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I heard something funny the other day. Scott's brother was quoted on TV as saying, "The TRUTH will set Scott free." What a joke, who can honestly think he is innocent. There is way too much evidence. Yes, nobody saw actually saw him kill her, but there is too many question without any answers. Every person he has crossed paths with he has flat out lied to. Why didn't he take the stand........ because he has no answers. Most of the people who think he is innocent because "he looks innocent". The some real great investigating, These are the same idiots who would date OJ Simpson.

Name: Suzi
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:42:24 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
We're following this story from Sydney, Australia and we can see how he has changed over the year, how sad he is...Look at scott peterson and you'll see that if he's a pathalogical liar and killer he would look different. OJ always looks SUS! It's a shame that all the leads weren't followed up on because it weakens the links of possibility and so when the defence comes to present it all appears to be heresay...from so long ago....don't want to make the police look like they cant do their job....matter of fact...we had a woman Lindy Chamberlain who was convicted of killing her newborn at Ayers Rock and was accqitted years after..then this old dude has just come forward this year and said he witnessed the Dingo taking the baby....I suspect Geargos will throw in a wild card....Might be Amber Fry..she's got that "don't cross me or make me a victum otherwise wise you're gonna pay "look about her...shouldn't judge a book by it's cover ...right? Bottom line,There are alot of cheating assholes (male and female) out there but that's a sign of weakness, you'd have to have some kind of insane power to carry off a murder...maybe there was a boating accident...if so then why wouldn't he call 911 and get the water police to look for her...so don't think that happened. I still think it's the cas od mistake identity...Why didn't the defence call her to the stand...I think there is the answer.

Name: richard
Date: Sunday, October 10, 2004 10:13:09 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I have same feeling that she killed her when scott left for fishing and she knew where he was going to fishing.

Name: richard
Date: Saturday, October 09, 2004 8:33:50 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
maybe amber fry killed scott wife

Name: dave
Date: Thursday, October 07, 2004 5:42:47 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
SCOTT is innocent,,the man was just goin fishing and his wife demanded to go with him and during the trip she got tangled up in some weights Scott had brought along for crab traps,,,,,standing up she fell overboard and Scott panic'd when he couldn't retrieve her and left the scene of the accident then made up a story that no one believes,,,just goes to show you should always tell the truth,,,,,

Name: Tina
Date: Thursday, October 07, 2004 3:15:03 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is a cold blooded MURDERER!!!! He is only now trying to camouflage his GUILT by LYING as USUAL !!!! He was having an affiar and was only thinking about HIS OWN Finanacial well being. NOT LACI and for sure NOT HIS SON. How did Laci not know anything about his Boat???? and if she did not know HOW was her hair and DNA found in that Boat ?????????? Hwy was he changing his appearance??? To avoid the Media?? Avoiding the Media is staying in your home with your RIGHT TO PRIVACY! Why go soooo far out of your way?? HELLO, he is a RAT and killer in my eyes and should be DROWNED to death just like his innocent wife and unborn SON. In the long run GOD will deal with him and I hope he get exactly what he deserves - an eye for an eye... Thats still not enough !! By the way have we EVER SEEN YOU CRY ???? other than when you were thinking about yourself AS USUAL .....................

Name: Lori
Date: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:31:23 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
How sad the possibility is that Scott has killed his pregnant wife. Imagine the pain that he must have dealing with his emotions whether he is guilty or innocent. This is only the beginning of his shattered life that he must carry with him whether he is convicted or not. Scott is paying a price for his actions regardless of the intensity we feel he may or may not deserve. Scott is fortunate, however, that I am not a juror in his trial.

Name: Alex
Date: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:33:25 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Yes, obviously. The real killer of Scott Peterson's wife was that guy who killed OJ's wife. He is a menace and needs to be stopped.

Name: Cute
Date: Sunday, October 03, 2004 9:07:41 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I find the Scott Peterson court case interesting in many ways. Firstly how it seems as if the Media and the court seem to believe that he is guilty even though it hasnt been proven! What if scott left on his boat with the wrong fishing equipment because he just wanted to get away from his wife?! I have a good example when situations worked bad against me: A couple of weeks ago, my parents decided to treat my brothers and I by letting us sleep at a hotel called Cresta Lodge by ourselves. The toilets in the rooms were not working because the water had been cut so i decided to go and take a dump in the bathroom near the lobby and right when i left, my parents called my room and my older sister step sister who was in my room told my parents that she didnt know where i went so my parents jumped into a conclusion that i had gone out of the hotel and gone clubbing. She tried phoning my brothers room but no one had picked up because he was down stairs with my 30 y.o. step sister whom my parents didnt know was there. So then they called my other brothers room, but they didnt answer coz they were asleep so they got pissed and came to the conclusion that we had left our rooms to go clubbing for sure. They tried to call again my room only to find out that i wasnt there so they tried to call the bar area of the hotel and heard that we werent there so they decided to travel 1hr 30 min to the hotel we were staying at and they saw us in our rooms and the questioned where we were and i told them that i went to the bath room downstairs coz the bath rooms didnt have water and then they flashed our toilets and found out there was water so it made my story sketchy. Then they asked why i was gone for so long and i told them i had gone to eat ice cream with my 30 y.o. sister and my brother at the hotel restaurant and i told them to ask the people down stairs but they didnt want to coz they thought we were guilty when we actually were telling the truth! That situation made me wonder wat if Peterson was telling the truth?! So wat if he dont show emotion... obviously he didnt have much feelings for his wife he was going for other woman! Do u expect the man to cry? GEEZ!

Name: Bubba
Date: Saturday, October 02, 2004 8:23:53 AM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott is just as innocent as O.J. right?

Name: Denise
Date: Thursday, September 30, 2004 1:13:27 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I cannot judge another human being, however; the law does stipulate that one cannot be found guilty if there is reasonable doubt. And now, after the last two days of the trial, and picking up more information on-line, I definately have reasonable doubt! Would a man about to kill his wife take the time out of his life to personally build the nursery furniture? Would he shop for clothes and CD's that would be a father's gift to his unborn child? Too many questions have been raised in the last two days of trial. Why didn't the police check more closely into the local attorney that was also pregnant, looked like Laci, and also had a golden retreiver named McKensie? Why did they not follow up on so many leads that the public called in? Why did the focus on Scott and Scott only? As much as I believe that Scott did not do this heinous crime, I almost wish he did it would confess to it. After all, think about how horrible it would be to send an innocent man to jail while a psycho is running around out there!

Name: Melanie
Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:23:20 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
How can ANY sane person say that Peterson is INNOCENT. The only thing going for him is that he is the world's foremost liar and let's hope this doesn't turn into another OJ situation. Every damn person in the world knows that man is guilty. Now Michael Jackson? I'd need to hear all the details before I make an opinion.

Name: Jennifer
Date: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:56:31 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I believe Scott is innocent. I do not find the evidence against him believable. Scott may be a cheating husband, he lied to his family, to his wife, to his mistress. However, there are MANY men and women who have affairs and lie to cover them up. That does not, in fact, make them murderers also. I pray for Scott, his family, and I pray for justice for Laci, her child, and her family. I believe Scott will be found innocent, and then the search for the REAL monster can begin...

Name: rebecca
Date: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:14:09 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
i suport scott i want to see evidence show me so what he cheated on his wife amber fry is a slut look at her back ground how did she pay for her boobs who cares what she has to say its not fair everyone has him guilty because of the media what if he wasnt cheating would they feel the same this does not make him guilty i wish his lawyers would be more aggressive i dont feel he did it

Name: Tiffany
Date: Friday, September 10, 2004 5:46:35 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
I believe Scott is innocent. How can you accuse someone or put someone to death without hard concrete evidence against him? The only evidence they have is his emotions. And how do we know he wasn't greiving behind closed doors? I think the prosecuters are making his actions to be blown way out of wack because they have no other possible leads. I think the defense needs to take a look into Amber Frey's background and family. I personally think she knew of Laci, and Scott didn't know she knew. They say she's dated married men on many occassions. It wouldn't suprise me a bit if she stalked him and became jealous. Beleive me, women can be psycho. and that comes from seeing my sister-in-law and some of the crazy stunts her and her family pulled on my brother and my family. So, I fully support Scott Petereson and he's family is doing the right thing by standing behind him. God says..You should never turn your back on family!! My heart does go out for Laci and her family. They need to get busy looking for the real killer.

Name: leah
Date: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:54:42 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Die in hell scott peterson, the gig is up!! the death penalty was designed for all of the Scott Petersons in the world

Name: Oh-woes-is-me-a-MAN-is-on-trial!!!
Date: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:42:37 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
See a doctor, quick. Does mental retardation run in your family?

Name: Gina
Date: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 5:21:11 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott is as quilty as hell. I have been following this case every day. It's a shame that his family is so blinded by their love for him. It's more of a shame that so many people are so blinded by his good looks. Inside those good looks is an evil selfish person that only wanted what he wanted and was to stupid to realize he would not get away with this. I hope they fry him! He deserves the most severe punishment. He shows no emotion. Think about it. All the dumb things he did. Who in their right mind would act the way he did, do the things he did, if they were innocent. God forgive me for having these feelings, but my heart goes out to Lacie's family. I grieve for them.

Name: Not so sure about Scott
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2003 12:24:07 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
There is a lot of damning circumstantial evidence against Scott and if, and I say IF, he did it he deserves death penalty. Laci was so beautiful and that precious baby would have been too. Whoever that was insulting Amber, that was just rude as hell. That poor girl didn"t know sorry ass Scott was married. Whether or not he killed Laci, he is a sicko to tell his "girlfriend" that his wife had passed and that was his first Christmas without her!!! Why don"t you people focus on someone who is already on death row and innocent, like Darlie Routier? Check out her website www.fordarlieroutier.org She did not kill her kids and attack herself. Listen to the 911 call and you will know she is innocent. Do not read the transcripts for the call, they are inaccurate. If you listen closely to the call you can hear all the inaccuracies. Back to Scott, if he is guilty, we will find out and he will be punished appropriately. Personally, I think he is guilty as hell. People don"t usually carry cement around on boats, tell the person they are cheating with that their spouse is dead (why couldn"t he have said divorced???), and he told Amber that he NEVER wanted to have kids so if they got married he would get a vasectomy. How coincidental that Laci"s body is found near where he was fishing, 90 miles from their home??? and scott asked he deecive if he were gonna use cadavor dogs before laci had been missing 24 hours

Name: Sarah
Date: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:11:39 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is a beautiful man who had a beautiful wife and would have had a beautiful son. He had it all. He would"ve had more. If he did do those crimes, and we cannot say yes or no as we are not his God, judge, or jury, or if he didn"t, I personally am shocked, outraged, disapointed, and, above all, in pain, for the family he loved as his own he let down and will no longer have any relationship with whatsoever no matter what; for his family who obviously loves and supports him and believed in him wholly; and for the woman who loved him more than any other, and the son he almost had. But if he didn"t do it, and I personally belive and hope he didn"t, I hope to God above the people of Modesto can somehow be more open-minded so he can get a fair trial and prove that. God bless Laci, Connor, the Rocha family, and the Peterson family. God bless Laci"s friends and Scott"s, too, none of whom did anything wrong or to deserve this. Also, may God help Scott, no matter what he did or did not do that fateful day. May he find Him and let Him save his soul.

Name: Mrs. G
Date: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:18:12 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Sorry, But I believe the man is guilty...I"ve not seen one shred of remorse in his facial expressions. If he had not done this deed, would he not be in great mourning?

Name: SparkleSpiceGirl2
Date: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:47:19 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
Scott Peterson is INNOCENT until proven guilty. Scott did not murder his beautiful, pregnant, wife for that mugly chick "Amber" or a life insurance policy cash-out. Scott & Laci proved they could be successful on their own and live the typical American dream - and at a young age at that!!! What about Amber, has she been checked-out? Modesto police didnt find Chandra Levy for quite some time either...nor her killer. Another pregnant woman disappeared from Modesto too..unsolved !!! A mother, daughter and friend also disappeared, werent found for some time, then found dead in the area (Yosemite, I believe). Hmmmm...People, I think the Modesto police are looking for the sacrifical lamb in Scott Peterson because they are inept and ill-equipped to do anything else but wear a badge. I watched an A&E program about the Peterson case and a Modesto investigating police official said, "Everytime someone in Modesto turns-up missing, the entire community goes out to search for them". Wow, what a fruitless and idiotic statement. What about the brown van with blood stains and duct tape...possibly the same duct tape used on Laci? There are too many other viable leads, other evidence to verify before nailing Scott to the cross. The media and the public judge how he is SUPPOSED to act...when no one can say EXACTLY how they"d act in the same situation. Any of us can only pre-suppose how we"d act, but no one would no for sure, if any actions or in-actions we"d make would help or hinder us. Scott Peterson is guilty of cheating on his wife and lying - but not of murdering her.

Name: sarahlx97@netscape.net
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:30:25 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
People are so closed minded. The media doesn"t want you to hear both sides. In this country getting a fair trial is hard to come by. I didn"t believe Scott Peterson at first. Until I read facts the defense had come out with that the media doesn"t want you to read. Now I support him 100%. Whatever happened with innocent until proven guilty?

Name: tchab41@aol.com
Date: Saturday, April 26, 2003 9:00:54 PM
Subject:(isnull)
Comment:
fuck him what a piece of shit

Leave/Read Comments

You Said

chris said:

"All Barack has really done is show that a cultural....

More...

chris said:

diane, that was the politest racist comment i have ever....

More...

chris said:

haHahhah PEOPEL LIEK THIS SHOULD HAVE HISTORY CHANNEL DOCUMENTARIES ABOUT....

More...